Independent daily Newspaper

 Home

 Old Archive RSS Feed    Advertise

About

Music 

 Turkish-Kurdish ‘Peace Process’: Another Historical Betrayal? - Part I

 Opinion — Analysis  
  The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author

 


Turkish-Kurdish ‘Peace Process’: Another Historical Betrayal? - Part I  14.7.2013 
Hiwa Zandi
Ekurd.net


 

 
The PKK demanded Turkey's recognition of the Kurds' identity in its constitution and of their language as a native language along with Turkish in the country's Kurdish region [Northern Kurdistan], the party also demanded an end to ethnic discrimination in Turkish laws and constitution against Kurds, ranting them full political freedoms. Turkey refuses to recognize its Kurdish population as a distinct minority and still denies the constitutional existence of Kurds. A large Turkey's Kurdish community, numbering to 23 million, openly sympathise with PKK rebels. Photo: Flickr
Read more by Hiwa Zandi | See Related Articles
July 14, 2013

Read Part I | Part II

1. Introduction

The unfolding ‘peace process’ between the Turkish government and PKK, resonated hope in Turkey and international community to finally bring an end to the decades old Turkish-Kurdish conflict.

While Kurds have embraced the initiative, most are suspicious of the Turkish government’s true intention. There are concerns that the Turkish political establishment may not act on its promises under the peace process. This emanates partly from the past experiences of Turkish deceit of the Kurds in 1920s and partly from the current Turkish military’s inconsistent measures that are incongruent with the undergoing rapprochement.

This article looks at the viability of the Turkish government’s peace process initiative. The article is divided into three parts. The first part looks at the Kurdish suspicions of the peace process based on the Turkish government’s historical deceit of the Kurds and current inconsistent measures taken under the peace process. The second part reflects upon the Kurdish suspicions by highlighting the causal connections that prompted the Turkish government to initiate the peace process. The final part looks at the possible counter measures the Kurds could undertake to avoid vicious consequences.

2. Historical Betrayal

In the aftermath of the First World War, the treaty of Sèvres (10 August 1920) promised Kurds a State of their own. Kurdish political elites such as Sharif Pasha and Emin Ali Bedir Khan were drawing and negotiating the boundaries of the promised independent State of Kurdistan which would include large Kurdish areas of current South-East Turkey. Kemal Ataturk,
www.ekurd.net the founder of modern Turkey, would see the circumstances irreversible unless he adopted strong political tactics painted with deep-seated social and religious values that could avoid such a development.

 
 
 

He approached the Kurdish tribal and religious leaders alluring them to perceive the treaty of Sèvres as an imperialist plot devised to divide the Turkish and Kurdish brotherhood. He made false representations and promises for a future republic in which Kurds and Turks would possess equal rights and share power. He established a parliament in 1920 giving equal representation to the Kurds.

He continued to caress Kurdish political simplicity until such times he could bury the chances of an independent Kurdistan under the treaty of Sèvres through negotiating the new treaty of Lausanne (24 July 1923). Once the treaty of Lausanne was agreed, he brutally crushed the Kurds and run a campaign of extinguishing Kurdish identity from the newly established State of Turkey. He banned Kurdish culture and language, crushed Kurdish rebellions with iron-fist and killed several thousands of Kurdish civilians.

3. Erdogan’s ‘Peace Process’

Premised on this bitter historical experience, it is therefore not surprising that the Kurds are suspicious of Erdogan’s so called ‘peace process’ initiative arguably aimed at resolving the Kurdish political problem in Turkey. Similar to Ataturk’s initial socio-religious indoctrination, Erdogan has also tried to charm the Kurdish minds by stressing on the Islamic concept of ‘brotherhood’ and collectively. In his several public addresses in Amed (Diyarbakir), Erdogan has emphasised Turkish-Kurdish ‘brotherhood’ and ‘unity’. He has undertaken to relinquish the Kurdish political and civil rights under the peace process.

However, on the practical grounds, Erdogan’s statements and promises have not yielded any solid results. This is at a time when PKK has nearly completed its obligations under the first phase of the peace plan by declaring ceasefire and withdrawing from the Turkey’s territorial boundary. The Turkish government has not responded by showing good faith or taking any major step to commence the second phase of the peace process. This would encompass freeing Kurdish political prisoners and making a series of fundamental legal reforms that address Kurdish political, cultural, social and economic grievances.

On the contrary, the process of restricting Kurdish culture and civil rights is continuing, thousands of Kurdish political activists are still holed in prisons and militarisation of Kurdish region is uninterrupted. Murat Karayilan, the current PKK Commander in Chief, even voiced his concern that contrary to the peace plan the Turkish government is currently building further military outposts, increasing the number of paramilitary forces and preparing for a large scale war.

This lack of action or progress from the part of Turkish government puts viability of the peace process under question. It further adds to the Kurds existing suspicions about the Erdogan’s intention in initiating the peace process.

 01.06.11 & 02.06.12.
 http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/06/01/turkey.prime.minister/index.html; http://www.businessturkeytoday.com/erdogan-addresses-public-in-diyarbakir.html


Read Part I | Part II

Hiwa Zandi is a lawyer, Kurdish politics specialist and Kurdish history researcher. He obtained bachelor of International Relations and Bachelor of Laws from the University of Queensland Australia in 2007. He was admitted as a lawyer in the Supreme Court of Queensland on 1 February 2010. He has translated and published two books in addition to his own research on the origins of Baloches from the Median Kurds (books can be downloaded from araspublishers.com or kurdipedia.info ). He is also a regular contributing writer and columnist for Ekurd.net. His email address: [email protected].

Copyright © 2013 Ekurd.net. All rights reserved
 

 

Top

  The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2023 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. Ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.