|
Kurdistan: The Next Flashpoint Between Turkey, Iraq, and the
Syrian Revolt |
|
Kurd Net
does not take credit for and is not responsible for the
content of news information on this page |
|
Kurdistan: The Next Flashpoint Between
Turkey, Iraq, and the Syrian Revolt
6.8.2012
By Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah - Jerusalem Center
for Public Affairs, Israel |
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2012
In the wake of the steady disintegration of the
Assad regime, Syrian opposition activists reported
that several towns, such as Amouda and Qabani in
Syria’s Kurdish northeast, had passed in mid-July
2012 without a fight into the local hands of a group
called the Free Kurdish Army. Thus emerged for the
first time in modern Kurdish history the nucleus of
an exclusively Kurdish-controlled enclave bordering
the predominantly Kurdish areas of Turkey. After
largely sitting on the sidelines of the Syrian
revolution, political groups from Syria’s Kurdish
minority in the northeastern region appear to have
moved decisively to claim control of the
Kurdish-populated towns.
The Free Kurdish Army was formed from the Democratic
Union Party (PYD), a group with historical links to
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party or PKK. The PKK, it
should be remembered, is regarded by both Turkey and
the United States as a terrorist organization
fighting the Turkish government for Kurdish
autonomy. The Kurds are reportedly concentrating
their efforts on wresting control of Qamishli, the
largest of the Kurdish cities, from the Syrian
government. Kurdish forces have already captured the
city of Ayn al-Arab in the Aleppo Governorate, where
they are flying the Kurdish flag.
The Turks, who have been at war with the PKK for
decades, have been monitoring developments in Syria
with increasing concern. Thus a columnist for the
Turkish daily Hurriyet wrote in late July: “Only a
week ago we had a 400-kilometer ‘Kurdish border.’
Now, 800 kilometers have been added to this.”1 The
Turkish government has bluntly warned: “We will not
allow a terrorist group to establish camps in
northern Syria and threaten Turkey.”2 Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made clear that Turkey
would take any step that is necessary against a
terrorist presence in northern Syria.3
Turkish observers have commented that the
geopolitics of the Middle East are now being
reshaped as the emergence of a “Greater Kurdistan”
is no longer a remote possibility, posing enormous
challenges for all the states hosting large Kurdish
populations: Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and Iran.4
Kurdistan is a potential land bridge for many of the
conflicts erupting in this part of the region. It
provides a ground route for Iraqi Kurdistan to
supply the Syrian Kurds as they seek greater
autonomy from Damascus. But its use will depend on
which power dominates the tri-border area between
Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. This area could equally
provide Iran with a corridor for moving supplies to
its Syrian surrogates and even to Hizbullah in
Lebanon. Perhaps this is why some commentators see
Kurdistan as the new regional flashpoint in the
Middle East.
An overview of the Kurds and Kurdistan will help put
these latest events in context.
The Kurds in Today’s Middle
East
• The Kurds are an Indo-European people who
immigrated to the Middle East, like the Iranians.
They mostly inhabit a region known as Kurdistan that
includes adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and
Turkey. Kurds constitute 7 percent of the population
in Iran, 15-20 percent in Iraq, perhaps 9 percent in
Syria, and 20 percent in Turkey. In all of these
countries except Iran, Kurds form the second largest
ethnic group. Roughly 55 percent of the world’s
Kurds live in Turkey, about 18 percent each in Iran
and Iraq, and slightly more than 5 percent in Syria.
• The number of Kurds living in Southwest Asia is
estimated at 26 to 34 million, with another one or
two million living in the diaspora. Kurds are the
fourth largest ethnic group in the Middle East after
Arabs, Persians, and Turks.
• While Turkey hosts the largest Kurdish population
in the Middle East, the question of Kurdish
independence should be treated separately from the
cases of Iraq, Syria, and Iran. Although
Turkish-Israeli relations have deteriorated during
the rule of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan,
Israeli policy should be based on the eventual
restoration of Israeli-Turkish strategic
cooperation. Hence Israeli policy toward the Kurdish
issue should not undermine the territorial integrity
of the Turkish state, or be interpreted in that
manner.
• The most likely candidate for Kurdish independence
is the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) in Northern
Iraq. The conflicts between the KRG and the central
Iraqi government in Baghdad have been steadily
growing over oil exploration agreements, the
location of internal boundaries, and
Kurdish rights under the Iraqi constitution.
Iraqi Kurdish leaders warned in 2012 that they will
seek independence if their differences with Baghdad
are not addressed. In the meantime, with the Iraqi
government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki backing
the regime of Bashar Assad and the KRG helping the
Syrian Kurds, Iraqi-Kurdish tensions have been
steadily rising.
• Turkey, which in the past was the main constraint
on the Iraqi Kurds, has become the dominant external
economic force in the KRG. It has proposed new
pipelines for Kurdish oil through Turkish territory.
Turkey’s objections to a KRG bid for independence
are seen to be declining. This might change if the
KRG became fully allied with the Syrian Kurdish
insurrection, which includes parties that back the
anti-Turkish PKK.
• The establishment of a viable, independent Kurdish
state in northern Iraq could be a geopolitically
positive development for Israel. Historical justice
would dictate that, with 22 Arab states in the
Middle East, the 35 million Kurds deserve at least
one sovereign state of their own. Beyond Iraq, the
emergence of more Kurdish independent areas is
unlikely. The state system in the Middle East has
been surprisingly robust since the advent of the
Arab Spring; Syria might become a federated state,
but is not expected to completely disintegrate.
• The Kurdish question places many Western states in
a hypocritical position, especially given the
efforts they constantly invest in the Palestinian
issue. The millions of Kurds currently dispersed
among Turkey, Iran, Syria, and Armenia do not
benefit from the right of self-determination,
granted to them over ninety years ago after World
War I. Today the Kurds are the largest national
grouping without a state of their own.
• Nevertheless, despite the common goal of
independent statehood, the Kurds in various
countries are hardly unified. It was the constant
rivalries between tribes, clans, families, and
villages that caused Kurdistan’s partition among
Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria in the first place.
The Kurds are also divided linguistically since they
speak at least four different dialects of the
Kurdish language. The Kurds have not yet understood
the lessons of history, and their divisions are
greater than the glue that can bind them together.
Moreover, with adversaries such as Turkey and Iran,
it might be possible to consider a smaller
independent Kurdish entity limited to Iraq, while
Syrian Kurds achieve self-determination in the
framework of a Syrian federal state.
Religion, Language,
Geography
The Kurds emerged as an ethnic group in the medieval
period. They are believed to be of heterogeneous
origins, combining a number of earlier tribal or
ethnic groups including Median Semitic, Turkic, and
Armenian elements. Most Kurds are Sunni Muslims
belonging to the Shafi’i school. Mystical practices
and participation in Sufi orders are also widespread
among Kurds. There is also a minority of Kurds who
are Shia Muslims, primarily living in the Ilam and
Kermanshah provinces of Iran and in central and
southeastern Iraq (Fayli Kurds), and some who are
Alawites, mostly living in Turkey.
The Kurdish language comprises the related dialects
spoken by the Kurds.5 A northern dialect of Kurdish
called Kurmanji is spoken in Turkey, the Kurdish
areas of Syria, and the most northern parts of Iraqi
Kurdistan. The Kurdish language holds official
status in Iraq as a national language along with
Arabic; it is recognized in Iran as a regional
language, though the Iranians regard Kurdish as a
dialect of Persian. In Armenia it is a minority
language.
In the southern areas of Iraqi Kurdistan, as well as
in western Iran, another dialect called Surani or
central Kurdish is spoken. Speakers of Kurmanji and
Surani can understand each other. A third Kurdish
dialect, known as Zaza, is really a separate
language. Kurmanji and Surani speakers usually
cannot understand speakers of Zaza. A fourth
linguistic group among the Kurds are speakers of
Gulani, which is closer to Zaza. The Kurds also use
different writing systems, relying on the Latin
alphabet in Turkey. While they use an Arabic script
in Iraq and Iran, a Cyrillic script is used in
Armenia. For purposes of nation-building, the Kurds
will need to produce a standardized Kurdish
language.
The Kurdistan Region in Iraq is largely mountainous,
with the highest point being a 3,611-meter
(11,847-foot) summit known locally as Cheekah Dar
(Black Tent). The mountains are part of the larger
Zagros range, which is also part of Iran. Many
rivers flow through the region’s mountains, and the
area is notable for its fertile land, plentiful
water, and picturesque landscapes. The Great Zab and
the Little Zab flow from east to west in the region.
The Tigris River enters Iraq via the Kurdistan
Region after flowing from Turkey.
The mountainous nature of Iraqi Kurdistan, the
variance of temperatures in its different parts, and
its wealth of water make it a land of agriculture
and tourism. It is also rich in minerals and
particularly oil, which for a long time was
extracted via pipeline through Iraq. The largest
lake in the region is Lake Dukan, and there are
several smaller ones such as the Duhok Lake.
The western and southern sections of the Kurdistan
Region are not as mountainous as the east. They are
characterized by rolling hills and sometimes plains,
and are greener than the rest of Iraq.
Historical Background
After defeating Shah Ismail I in 1514, Ottoman
Sultan Selim I annexed Armenia and Kurdistan and
entrusted the disposition of the conquered
territories to Idris, a historian who was a Kurd
from Bitlis in Turkey. Idris divided the territory
into sanjaks or districts and, making no attempt to
interfere with the principle of heredity, installed
the local chiefs as governors. He also resettled the
rich pastoral country between Erzerum and Erivan,
which had lain in waste since the conquests of Timur
(Tamerlane), with Kurds from the Hakkari and Bohtan
districts.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Ottoman
centralist policies aimed to remove power from the
principalities and localities and this directly
affected the Kurdish emirs. The first modern Kurdish
nationalist movement emerged in 1880 with an
uprising led by a Kurdish landowner and head of the
powerful Shemdinan family, Sheikh Ubeydullah. He
demanded political autonomy or outright independence
for Kurds and the recognition of a Kurdistan state
without interference from Turkish or Persian
authorities. The uprising against Qajar Persia and
the Ottoman Empire was ultimately suppressed by the
Ottomans, and Ubeydullah, along with other notables,
was exiled to Istanbul.
The Kurdish ethnonationalist movement that emerged
following World War I and the end of the Ottoman
Empire was largely a reaction to the changes taking
place in mainstream Turkey. These included radical
secularization, which the strongly Muslim Kurds
abhorred; a centralization of authority that
threatened the power of local chieftains and Kurdish
autonomy; and rampant Turkish nationalism in the new
Turkish Republic, which threatened to marginalize
the Kurds.
The Kurds, however, were also in internal conflict
over the destiny of their country. Some, very open
to the pan-Islamist ideology of the sultan-caliph,
had seen the salvation of the Kurdish people in a
status of cultural and administrative autonomy
within the Ottoman Empire. Others, claiming to take
inspiration from the principle of nationalities, the
ideas of the French Revolution, and American
President Woodrow Wilson, fought for Kurdistan’s
total independence.
The split was accentuated following the Ottoman
defeat by the Allied Powers in 1918. Those fighting
for independence hurriedly put together a delegation
at the Versailles Conference to present “the claims
of the Kurdish nation.” This helped place the
Kurdish national question on the international
agenda. The Treaty of Sèvres, concluded on 10 August
1920 between the Allies – France, Great Britain, and
the United States – and the Ottoman Empire, actually
recommended, in section 111 (art. 64), the creation
of a Kurdish state in part of Kurdistan:
If within one year from the coming into force of
the present Treaty the Kurdish peoples within the
areas defined in Article 2 [i.e., Turkey] shall
address themselves to the Council of the League of
Nations in such a manner as to show that a majority
of the population of these areas desires
independence from Turkey, and if the Council then
considers that these peoples are capable of such
independence and recommends that it shall be granted
to them, Turkey hereby agrees to execute such a
recommendation, and to renounce all rights and title
over these areas.
This treaty, however, was superseded by the Treaty
of Lausanne signed on 24 July 1923, which was
concluded with modern Turkey after the Ottoman
Empire’s dissolution. The Treaty of Lausanne did not
provide any guarantee of the Kurds’ rights and
handed the major part of Kurdistan over to the new
Turkish state. Beforehand, in accordance with the
Franco-Turkish Agreement of 20 October 1921, France
had annexed the Kurdish provinces of Jazira and
Kurd-Dagh to Syria, placing them under France’s
mandate. Iranian Kurdistan, of which a large part
was controlled by the Kurdish leader Simko, lived in
a state of near-dissidence vis-à-vis the Persian
central government.
The fate of the petroleum-rich Kurdish province of
Mosul, which is today part of Iraq, remained
undecided. Both the Turks and the British claimed
it. The Treaty of Sèvres also addressed the question
of Iraqi Kurdistan, stating that “no objection will
be raised by the Principal Allied Powers to the
voluntary adhesion to such an independent Kurdish
State [in Turkey] of the Kurds inhabiting that part
of Kurdistan which has hitherto been included in the
Mosul Valiyet.”
After the Treaty of Sèvres unraveled, Britain’s
imperial planners in the Colonial Office insisted on
including Kurdistan in their mandate for Iraq so as
to add to its Sunni population and offset the
plurality of the Iraqi Shia. The League of Nations
recognized the annexation of Kurdistan to Iraq in
1925. The British promised to make Iraqi Kurdistan
autonomous once Iraq gained its independence. That
commitment was not fulfilled either by the British
or the Iraqi regime that succeeded their
administration in 1932 as Iraq became independent.
Thus, at the end of 1925, the country of the Kurds,
known since the twelfth century as Kurdistan, found
itself divided between four states: Turkey, Iran,
Iraq, and Syria.
Kurdish Communities in West
Asia
Iraq
After the military coup by Abdul Karim Qasim in
1958, Mustafa Barzani, head of the Barzani clan, who
had become the vocal advocate of Kurdish rights in
Iraq, was invited by Qasim to return from his exile
in the Soviet Union where he had been since 1945.
Barzani was greeted with a hero’s welcome in Iraq.
As part of the deal between Qasim and Barzani, the
former promised to give the Kurds regional autonomy
in return for Barzani’s support for his policies.
Meanwhile, during 1959-1960, Barzani became the head
of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), which was
granted legal status in 1960.
By early 1960, though, it was clear that Qasim would
not fulfill his promise of regional autonomy. Hence,
the KDP began to agitate for it. In the face of
growing Kurdish dissent, as well as Barzani’s
personal power, Qasim began to incite the Barzanis’
historical enemies, the Baradost and Zebari tribes,
which led to intertribal warfare throughout 1960 and
early 1961. By February 1961, Barzani had defeated
the pro-government forces and
consolidated his position as leader of the Kurds.
At this point he ordered his forces to occupy all
government offices in Kurdish territory and expel
the officials. This was not received well in
Baghdad, and Qasim began preparing for a military
offensive to regain government control of the north.
Meanwhile, in June 1961, the KDP issued a detailed
ultimatum to Qasim outlining Kurdish grievances and
demanding rectification. Qasim ignored it and
continued planning for war. It was not until 10
September, when an Iraqi army column was ambushed by
a group of Kurds,www.ekurd.net
that the Kurdish revolt truly began. Qasim reacted
by ordering the Iraqi air force to indiscriminately
bomb Kurdish villages, which ultimately served to
rally the entire Kurdish population toward Barzani.
Qasim, however, profoundly distrusted the Iraqi army
and purposely failed to adequately arm it, using
ammunition rationing. Hence his government was not
able to subdue the insurrection. This stalemate
irritated powerful factions in the military and is
said to be one of the main reasons the Ba’athists
overthrew Qasim in February 1963.
In November 1963, after considerable infighting
among the civilian and military wings of the
Ba’athists, they were ousted by Abdul Salam Arif in
another coup. Then, after another failed offensive
against the Kurds, Arif declared a ceasefire in
February 1964. This provoked a split between Kurdish
urban radicals, on the one hand, and Peshmerga
(freedom-fighter) forces led by Barzani, on the
other. Barzani agreed to the ceasefire and deposed
the radicals from the KPD.
Following the unexpected death of Arif, who was
replaced by his brother Abdul Rahman Arif, the Iraqi
government launched a last-ditch effort to overcome
the Kurds. This campaign failed in May 1966 when
Barzani’s forces thoroughly defeated the Iraqi army
at the Battle of Mount Handrin, near Rawanduz. It
was said that the Kurds slaughtered an entire
brigade. Recognizing the futility of continuing this
campaign, Rahman Arif announced a twelve-point peace
program in June 1966. It was not implemented,
however, because of his overthrow by the Ba’ath
Party in still another coup in 1968.
The Ba’ath government launched a new campaign to end
the Kurdish insurrection, but it stalled in 1969.
This can be attributed to the internal power
struggle in Baghdad and also to tensions with Iran.
Moreover, the Soviet Union pressured the Iraqis to
come to terms with Barzani. A peace plan announced
in March 1970 provided for broader Kurdish autonomy.
The plan also gave Kurds representation in
government bodies, to be implemented within four
years. Nevertheless, in the same period, the Iraqi
government embarked on an Arabization program in the
oil-rich regions of Kirkuk and Khanaqin. In the
following years the Baghdad government overcame its
internal divisions. It concluded a friendship treaty
with the Soviet Union in April 1972 and ended its
isolation in the Arab world. The Kurds, for their
part, remained dependent on Iranian military support
and could do little to strengthen their forces.
In 1973, the United States made a secret agreement
with the Shah of Iran to begin covertly funding
Kurdish rebels against Baghdad through the CIA and
in collaboration with Israel. Both are believed to
be active in the country through the launch of the
2003 U.S. invasion and into the present. In 1974,
the Iraqi government retaliated with a new offensive
against the Kurds and pushed them close to the
border with Iran. Iraq told Tehran it was willing to
satisfy other Iranian demands if it would end its
aid to the Kurds.
With mediation by Algerian President Houari
Boumédiènne, Iran and Iraq reached a comprehensive
settlement in March 1975 known as the Algiers Pact.
It left the Kurds helpless and Tehran cut off
supplies to them. Barzani fled to Iran with many of
his supporters. Others surrendered en masse and the
rebellion ended after a few days. As a result, the
Iraqi government extended its control over the
northern region. To secure its influence, Iraq
launched an Arabization program, moving Arabs to the
vicinity of Kurdistan oil fields, particularly those
around Kirkuk. The government’s repressive measures
against the Kurds after the Algiers Pact led to
renewed clashes between the Iraqi army and Kurdish
guerrillas in 1977. In 1978 and 1979, 600 Kurdish
villages were burned down and approximately 200,000
Kurds were deported to the other parts of the
country.
During the Iran-Iraq War, the Iraqi government again
implemented anti-Kurdish policies and a de facto
civil war broke out. Iraq was widely condemned by
the international community but never seriously
punished for its actions, including the killing of
thousands of Kurds with chemical weapons.
The first wave of attacks against the Kurds during
the Iran-Iraq War was carried out in 1982 when 8,000
Barzanis were arrested; their remains were returned
to Kurdistan in 2008. The second wave was a campaign
of systematic genocide against the Kurdish
population. Between 29 March 1987 and 23 April 1989,
the Anfal (Spoils of War) campaign involved the
destruction of over 2,000 villages and the murder of
182,000 Kurdish civilians. The campaign, under the
command of Ali Hassan al-Majid, encompassed ground
offensives, aerial bombing, systematic destruction
of communities, mass deportations, firing squads,
and chemical attacks, including the infamous attack
on the Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988 that killed
5,000 civilians instantly. The town of Qala Dizeh
(population 70,000) was completely destroyed by the
Iraqi army. The campaign also included the
Arabization of Kirkuk; Kurds and other ethnic groups
were driven out of the oil-rich city and replaced
with Arab settlers from central and southern Iraq.
After the collapse of the Kurdish uprising of March
1991, which broke out after Saddam Hussein’s defeat
by the U.S.-led coalition, Iraqi troops recaptured
most of the Kurdish areas and 1.5 million Kurds
abandoned their homes and fled to the Turkish and
Iranian borders. It is estimated that close to
20,000 Kurds died from exhaustion, hunger, cold, and
disease. On 5 April 1991, the UN Security Council
passed Resolution 688, which demanded that Iraq end
its measures against the Kurds and allow immediate
access to international humanitarian organizations.
This was the first international document to mention
the Kurds by name since the League of Nations’
arbitration of Mosul in 1925.
In mid-April, the U.S.-led coalition established
safe havens within Iraqi borders and prohibited
Iraqi planes from flying north of the 36th parallel.
In October 1991, Kurdish guerrillas captured the
cities of Erbil and Sulaymaniyah after a series of
clashes with Iraqi troops. Late that month, the
Iraqi government retaliated by slapping a food and
fuel embargo on the Kurds and ceasing to pay civil
servants in the Kurdish region. The embargo,
however, backfired and in May 1992 the Kurds held
parliamentary elections and established the
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). An official
internal boundary between the KRG and the rest of
Iraq was established, though the KRG effectively
administered Kurdish-populated areas beyond this
line, over which there is to this day a territorial
dispute between the Kurds and the Iraqi government.
This dispute includes the city of Kirkuk.
The Kurdish population welcomed the American troops
in 2003 with celebrations and dancing in the
streets. The area controlled by the Peshmerga was
expanded, and Kurds now had effective control in
Kirkuk and parts of Mosul. The authority of the KRG
and legality of its laws and regulations were
recognized in articles 113 and 137 of the new Iraqi
constitution ratified in 2005. By the beginning of
2006, the two Kurdish administrations of Erbil and
Sulaimaniyah were unified.
Iraqi Kurds constitute 15-20 percent of Iraq’s
population. They are the majority in at least three
provinces of northern Iraq, together known as Iraqi
Kurdistan. Kurds also have a presence in Kirkuk,
Mosul, Khanaqin, and Baghdad. Around 300,000 Kurds
live in Baghdad, 50,000 in Mosul, and around 100,000
in southern Iraq.
Iraqi Kurdistan is a parliamentary democracy with a
111-seat regional assembly. Jalal Talabani, leader
of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) party, was
elected president of the new Iraqi administration,
while KDP leader Massoud Barzani is president of the
Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). The three
governorates of Dahuk, Erbil, and Sulaymaniyah
comprise around 40,000 square kilometers (15,000
square miles) and have a population of around 4
million.
Since 1992, the KRG has been based in Erbil, the
capital of Iraqi Kurdistan. The KRG’s parliament,
elected by popular vote, is called the Iraqi
Kurdistan National Assembly, and its cabinet is
composed of the KDP, the PUK, and their allies (the
Iraqi Communist Party, the Socialist Party of
Kurdistan, etc.). Structurally and officially, the
two main parties exhibit few differences from each
other. Their international organizations and
structures of authority are similar.
Nechirvan Idris Barzani, Massoud’s nephew, was prime
minister of the KRG from 1999 to 2009, including
presiding over the first KDP-PUK unified cabinet
from 2006 to 2009. Masrour, Massoud’s son, is now a
member of the Political Bureau. Nechirvan, as prime
minister, spearheaded unprecedented social and
economic reforms, including attention to violence
against women, improvements in infrastructure, and a
focus on the private sector and foreign investment.
He has also been at the forefront of the
rapprochement with Turkey and the development of oil
and gas fields in the region.
Elections for the Kurdistan National Assembly are
held every four years; the most recent were on 25
July 2009. The leading political alliance was the
Kurdistani List. It consisted of the two main
political parties, PUK and PDK, and won 59 seats.
The newer and less popular competing movement, the
Gorran (Change) List headed by Nawshirwan Mustafa,
won 25 of the 111 seats. It had a strong showing in
the city of Sulaymaniyah and the Sulaymaniyah
Governorate, which was previously considered the
PUK’s stronghold. The Reform List, consisting of
four parties, won 13 seats. In addition, the Islamic
movement won 2, and 11 were reserved for the Turkmen
(5 seats), Assyrian (5), and Armenian (1) minority
parties.
Elections for the governorate councils are held
every four years. Each council has forty-one
members. The last governorate-council elections for
Kurdistan were held in 2009.
Iraqi Kurdistan houses numerous consulates, embassy
offices, trade offices, and honorary consulates of
countries that want to increase their influence and
cultivate better ties with the KRG. As of October
2010 there were twenty diplomatic representations in
the region, including Turkey.
The KRG’s representative to the United States, Qubad
Talabani, is the youngest son of Iraqi President
Jalal Talabani. The KRG’s high representative to the
United Kingdom is Bayan Sami Abdul-Rahman, daughter
of Kurdish leader Sami Abdul-Rahman, who was killed
in a terrorist attack on Kurdish political party
headquarters in Erbil in February 2004.
The Kurdistan Region’s economy is dominated by the
oil industry, agriculture, and tourism. Thanks to
relative peace in the region, it has a more
developed economy than other parts of Iraq.
Following the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s
administration and the subsequent violence, the
three provinces fully under KRG control were the
only three in Iraq to be ranked “secure” by the U.S.
military. This relative stability has allowed the
KRG to sign a number of investment contracts with
foreign companies.
In 2006, the first new oil well since the invasion
of Iraq was drilled in the Kurdistan Region by the
Norwegian energy company DNO. Initial indications
are that the oil field contains at least 100 million
barrels of oil. The KRG has also signed exploration
agreements with several other oil companies,
including Canada’s Western Oil Sands and the UK’s
Sterling Energy and Gulf Keystone Petroleum. The
Iraqi government has blacklisted international oil
giants like Chevron and Exxon Mobil that sign
contracts with the KRG.6 The Iraqi government of
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki refuses to recognize
the right of the KRG to unilaterally sign oil
agreements with international companies, insisting
that this is the responsibility of the central
government in Baghdad. KRG President Massoud Barzani
disagrees with al-Maliki.
It is noteworthy that in 2004, per capita income in
the KRG was 25 percent higher than in the rest of
Iraq. The government continues to receive a portion
of the revenue from Iraq’s oil exports, and it will
soon implement a unified foreign investment law. The
KRG also has plans to build a media city in Erbil
and free trade zones near the borders of Turkey and
Iran.
Since 2003, the stronger economy of Iraqi Kurdistan
has attracted around 20,000 workers from other parts
of Iraq. According to President Talabani, since 2003
the number of millionaires in Sulaymaniyah has
increased from 12 to 2,000, reflecting the region’s
financial and economic growth.
Iraqi Kurdistan currently has the lowest poverty
rates in Iraq. Moreover, according to the KRG
website, not a single coalition soldier died nor was
a single foreigner kidnapped since 2003 in
KRG-administered areas.
Because of the devastation of the Iraqi army’s
campaigns under Saddam Hussein and previous regimes,
the Kurdistan Region’s infrastructure was never able
to modernize. After the 1991 safe haven was
established, the KRG launched projects to
reconstruct the region. Since then, of the 4,500
villages destroyed by Saddam Hussein’s regime, the
KRG has succeeded in reconstructing 65 percent of
them. Furthermore, since his regime was deposed in
2003, the KRG has been able to scale up its service
delivery and infrastructure, which has been changing
the region’s economic landscape and facilitating
investment projects.
Iraqi Kurdistan is accessible by land and air. By
land it may be reached most easily from Turkey
through the Habur Border Gate, the only border
crossing between Kurdistan and Turkey. This gate can
be reached by bus or taxi from airports in Turkey as
close as the Mardin or Diyarbakir airports, as well
as from Istanbul or Ankara. Iraqi Kurdistan has two
border gates with Iran, the Haji Omaran gate and the
Bashmeg gate near Sulaimaniyah. The region also has
a border gate with Syria known as Faysh Khabur. From
within Iraq, the Kurdistan Region can be reached by
land from multiple roads.
Iraqi Kurdistan has opened its doors to the world
with international airports in Erbil and
Sulaymaniyah. Both operate flights to Middle Eastern
and European destinations. The KRG has spent
millions of dollars on these airports to attract
international carriers, and currently Austrian
Airlines, Lufthansa, Etihad, Royal Jordanian, Gulf
Air, Middle East Airlines, Atlas Jet, and Fly Dubai
all service the region. There are also at least two
military airfields in Iraqi Kurdistan.
The leadership in Iraqi Kurdistan has a growing set
of grievances against the Iraqi central government.
Speaking at the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy on 12 April 2012, Massoud Barzani listed the
Kurdish complaints: “The constitution is breached on
a daily basis, and the same individual [Iraqi Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki] holds the powers of prime
minister, commander-in-chief of the armed forces,
defense minister, chief of intelligence, and
interior minister.” In his words, “the status quo in
Iraq remains unacceptable.” He hinted at the need to
hold a referendum on the future status of Iraqi
Kurdistan, given what he regarded as the abuse of
power in Baghdad.
The future of Iraqi Kurdistan is tied to the future
of the Iraqi state. With the U.S. military
withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011, friction
has grown between the main Iraqi communities. Iraq’s
Sunni vice-president has sought refuge in Iraqi
Kurdistan from Iraq’s Shia prime minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Should Iraq move toward political disintegration,
then the emergence of an independent Iraqi Kurdistan
will be inevitable. That will undoubtedly have
implications for neighboring Kurdish communities,
especially in Syria and Iran.
Developments with the Syrian Kurds are influencing
the politics of Iraqi Kurdistan. While Barzani has
been supportive of the Syrian Kurdish groups, al-Maliki,
reflecting the wishes of his Iranian backers, has
supported the continuing rule of the Assad regime.
This has recently generated military tensions
between the KRG and the central government in
Baghdad. For example, al-Maliki’s government decided
to deploy the Iraqi Army in the area connecting
Iraqi Kurdistan to the Kurdish areas of Syria,
thereby giving Baghdad the ability to choke off KRG
supplies to the Syrian Kurdish revolt. This area has
been under the control of the KRG and is under
dispute with the central Iraqi government in
Baghdad. Barzani protested against al-Maliki’s move
and held this strategic area with his Kurdish
Peshmerga units there instead.7
The most critical external factor influencing
whether Iraqi Kurdistan decides to declare
independence will be the policy of Turkey.
Understandably, Turkey has traditionally feared a
Kurdish state in northern Iraq because of its
potential influence on Turkey’s Kurds. But Turkish
attitudes have evolved. Barzani has not been
supportive of PKK operations against the Turkish
army. At the same time, Turkish companies have
become the largest international investors in the
KRG’s area of control. The Turks are also interested
in Kurdish oil and gas and have proposed a new
pipeline into Turkey for this purpose. As Ankara
becomes more tolerant about Kurdish independence,
then one of its major constraints will be removed.
Turkey
Presently, Turkey’s population is approximately 75
million. Kurdish sources claim there are as many as
25 million Kurds in Turkey, but some Turkish
demographers estimate that the number may actually
be as high as 37 million Kurds, or at least half the
Turkish population. In any case, Kurds are the
country’s largest minority group, and they have
posed the most serious and persistent challenge to
the official image of a homogeneous society. During
the 1930s and 1940s, the government disguised the
presence of the Kurds statistically by categorizing
them as “Mountain Turks.” This was changed to the
new euphemism of “Eastern Turks” in 1980.
Historically, the Kurds have mostly been located in
eastern Turkey. But there has been significant
population movement within the country in recent
decades. Today, significant Kurdish population
concentrations are also located in Ankara, Istanbul,
and Izmir.
The Republic of Turkey, founded in 1923, put an end
to the Ottoman caliphate and sultanate. Since then
there have been several Kurdish rebellions: the
Koçkiri, Sheikh Said, Dersim, and Ararat rebellions.
In 1937-1938, approximately 50,000-70,000 Alevi
Kurds were killed and thousands went into exile. A
key component of the Turkification process was
massive population resettlement. The main policy
document in this context was the 1934 law on
resettlement. This policy targeted the region of
Dersim as one of its first test cases, with
disastrous consequences for the local population.
The Dersim massacre is often confused with the
Dersim Rebellion that took place during these
events.
After the 1960 military coup, the State Planning
Organization (DPT) was established under the Prime
Ministry to solve the problem of Kurdish separatism
and underdevelopment. In 1961, the DPT prepared a
report titled “The Principles of the State’s
Development Plan for the East and Southeast,”
shortened to “Eastern Report.” It proposed to defuse
separatism by encouraging ethnic mixing through
migration (to and from the southeast). This was not
unlike the policies pursued by the Committee of
Union and Progress under the Ottoman Empire. The
labor minister at the time, Bülent Ecevit, was of
Kurdish ancestry and criticized the report.
During the 1970s, the separatist movement coalesced
into the Marxist-Leninist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).
Many states and organizations, including the United
States, United Nations, NATO, and the European
Union, define it as a terrorist organization. From
1984 to 1999, the Turkish military was embroiled in
a conflict with the PKK. During the guerrilla war
much of the countryside in the southeast was
depopulated, with Kurdish civilians moving to local
defensible centers such as Diyarbakır, Van, and
Şırnak, as well as cities of western Turkey and even
to Western Europe.
Reasons for the depopulation included PKK atrocities
against Kurdish clans they could not control as well
as Turkish civilians and soldiers, the poverty of
the southeast, and the Turkish state’s military
operations. Human Rights Watch has documented many
instances where the Turkish army forcibly evacuated
villages, destroying houses and equipment to prevent
the inhabitants’ return because of alleged – but
unlikely – PKK membership. An estimated 300 Kurdish
villages in Turkey were virtually wiped off the map,
displacing over 378,000 people.
This conflict reached its epitome during the 1990s,
when the National Security Council sanctioned a
covert war using special forces, village guards,
mafia, and contract killers while the PKK
increasingly attacked the Turkish civilian
population using, among other things, suicide
bombings. The conflict tapered off after the capture
of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan.
Officially protected death squads are accused in the
disappearance of 3,200 Kurds and Assyrians in 1993
and 1994 in the so-called “mystery killings.” The
victims included Kurdish politicians, human rights
activists, journalists, teachers, and other members
of the intelligentsia. Virtually none of the
perpetrators were investigated or punished. The
Turkish government also encouraged the Islamic
extremist group Hezbollah to assassinate suspected
PKK members and often ordinary Kurds. Azimet
Köylüoğlu, the state minister for human rights,
revealed the extent of the security forces’ excesses
in the fall of 1994: “While acts of terrorism in
other regions are done by the PKK, in Tunceli
province it is state terrorism. In Tunceli, it is
the state that is evacuating and burning villages.
In the southeast there are two million people left
homeless.”
Since the 2009 municipal elections, which gave the
Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) the majority in the
Kurdish region, 9,000 people including elected
officials, political militants, academics, and NGO
workers have been arrested for allegedly having
links to the Union of Kurdistan Communities (KCK).
The KCK, a semiclandestine organization, is alleged
to be the PKK’s extension into civil society and
politics. Turkey has declared war on this embryonic
independent administration.
The KCK forms the militant base and controls the
mayors and deputies of the legal party, the BDP. It
also collects a revolutionary tax both in Turkey and
abroad. According to a Finance Ministry audit,
Kurdish municipalities have paid at least €12
million to the guerrillas.
Since the beginning of the Arab Spring, Turkey has
been held up as a blueprint for emergent Middle
Eastern democracies. But many observers question
whether its treatment of its Kurdish minority gives
Turkey the right to be regarded as a role model.
In general, life has improved for Turkey’s Kurds,
particularly under Prime Minister Erdogan’s
conservative Justice and Development (AK) Party,
which has ruled the country since 2002. Erdogan is
the first Turkish leader to acknowledge the state’s
“mistakes” in its handling of the Kurds. In a slew
of groundbreaking reforms, AK has eased restrictions
on the Kurds’ long-banned mother tongue, poured
money into their impoverished region, and launched
secret talks with the imprisoned Ocalan.
In 2009, a deal to disarm the rebels seemed within
reach. It collapsed, however, after a string of
deadly PKK attacks. Yet the government continued to
talk with Ocalan who, despite having spent the last
twelve years behind bars, has largely retained his
grip on the PKK. But everything changed when the
rebels escalated the violence, killing more than
forty Turkish soldiers and policemen.
Erdogan has often acknowledged that the Kurdish
problem cannot be solved by military means alone,
and he has vowed to continue his reforms. Yet
officials close to him say he is fed up with the
Kurds’ unrelenting demands.
Iran
The Kurdish area of Iran has been part of this
country from historical times. Today the Kurds
constitute about 7 percent of the overall
population. The Persians, Kurds, and speakers of
other Indo-European languages in Iran are
descendants of Aryan tribes that began migrating in
the second millennium BCE from Central Asia into
what is now Iran.
In the seventeenth century, a large number of Kurds
were settled by Shah Abbas I in the cities of
northern Khorasan province in eastern Iran (Quchan,
Bojnurd, Shirvan, Daregaz, and Esfaraeen) to defend
Iran’s frontier against Uzbeks. Others migrated to
Afghanistan where they took refuge. The Kurds of
Khorasan, numbering around 700,000, still use the
Kurmanji Kurdish dialect. During the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries, successive Iranian governments
crushed Kurdish revolts led by Kurdish notables such
as Shaikh Ubaidullah (against the Qajars in 1880)
and Simko (against the Pahlavis in the 1920s).
In January 1946, during the Soviet occupation of
northwestern Iran, the Soviet-backed Kurdish
Republic of Mahabad declared independence in parts
of Iranian Kurdistan. But Soviet forces left Iran in
May 1946, and the self-declared republic fell to the
Iranian army after only a few months; its president,
Qazi Muhammad, was hanged publicly in Mahabad. After
the 1953 Iranian coup d’état, Mohammad Reza Shah
Pahlavi was increasingly autocratic and suppressed
most opposition including Kurdish political groups
seeking greater rights for Iranian Kurds. He also
prohibited any teaching of the Kurdish language.
Kurdish political organizations were enthusiastic
supporters of the revolution against the Shah which
brought Ayatollah Khomeini to power in February
1979. The Shah had shown himself to be no friend of
Kurdish aspirations for greater autonomy and a
loosening of Tehran’s control over their affairs.
Yet, since the early days of the revolution,
relations between the central government and Kurdish
organizations have been fraught with difficulties.
The Kurds, with their different language and
traditions and their cross-border alliances, were
seen as vulnerable to exploitation by foreign powers
who sought to destabilize the young republic. Sunni
Kurds, unlike the overwhelming majority of their
countrymen, abstained from voting to endorse the
creation of an Islamic Republic in April 1979. That
referendum institutionalized Shia primacy and made
no provision for regional autonomy.
The crisis deepened after Kurds were denied seats in
the Assembly of Experts gathering in 1979, which was
responsible for writing the new constitution.
Khomeini barred Abdul Rahman Ghassemlou, the elected
representative of the region, from participating in
the Assembly of Experts’ first meeting. Hence the
new Iranian constitution deprived the mostly-Sunni
Kurds of their political rights.
In early 1979, hostilities broke out between armed
Kurdish factions and the Iranian revolutionary
government’s security forces. The Kurdish forces
mainly included the Democratic Party of Iranian
Kurdistan (KDPI) and the leftist Komala
(Revolutionary Organization of Kurdish Toilers).
The new leadership had little patience for Kurdish
demands and opted to crush the unrest militarily. In
a December 1979 speech, Khomeini said the concept of
an ethnic minority ran counter to Islamic doctrines.
He also accused those who did not wish Muslim
countries to be united of creating the issue of
nationalism among minorities. His views were shared
by many in the clerical leadership.
In the spring of 1980, government forces under the
command of President Abolhassan Banisadr took back
most of the Kurdish cities through a huge military
campaign, sending in mechanized military divisions
to Mahabad, Sanandaj, Pawe, Marivan, and others.
Entire villages and towns were destroyed to force
the Kurds into submission. Ayatollah Khalkhali
sentenced thousands of men to execution after
summary trials. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard
Corps fought to reestablish government control in
the Kurdish regions. More than 10,000 Kurds were
killed in the process.
In 1997, Sunni Kurds took part in the presidential
election. Both civilian and military Kurdish
opposition groups asked Kurds to do so. The winner,
President Mohammad Khatami, praised the glory of
Kurdish culture and history. From the Kurdish side,
demands mainly concerned the Kurdish language and
the appointment of top-level officials. In his first
term, Khatami appointed Abdollah Ramezanzadeh to be
the first Kurdish governor of the Iranian province
of Kurdistan. He also appointed several Sunni and
Shia Kurds as his own or cabinet members’ advisers.
In his second term Khatami had two Kurdish cabinet
members, both of them Shia.
In February 1999, Kurdish nationalists staged
massive protests in several cities such as Mahabad,
Sanandaj, and Urmia opposing the government and
supporting Abdullah Ocalan. This was viewed as
“transnationalization” of the Kurdish movement and
these protests were violently suppressed by
government forces.
The increased presence of Kurdish representatives in
the sixth parliament (elected in 2000) led to
expectations that some of their constituents’
demands would be met. After the first round, in
which eighteen Kurds were elected, one candidate
said he expected that there would be more Kurdish
instruction at the university in Sanandaj, and he
called on the Khatami government to appoint more
Kurdish officials. Subsequently, a forty-member
parliamentary faction was formed that represented
the predominantly Kurdish provinces of Kurdistan and
Kermanshah. However, many other civilian Kurdish
activists did not join the reform movement. Among
the latter was Mohammad Sadiq Kaboudvand, who
started an independent human rights association to
defend Kurds’ rights.
In present-day Iran, while Shia religious
institutions are encouraged, Sunni institutions are
suppressed. In 1993, a newly-constructed Sunni
mosque in Sanandaj was destroyed by a mob of Shia
zealots. Despite the fact that more than one million
Sunnis live in Tehran, many of them Kurds, no Sunni
mosque exists to serve their religious needs. In a
rare public protest, eighteen Sunni parliamentarians
wrote to the authorities in July 2003 to criticize
the treatment of the Sunni Muslim community and the
refusal to allow construction of a mosque in Tehran.
On 9 July 2005, the Kurdish opposition activist
Shivan Qaderi (also known as Shwane Qadri or Sayed
Kamal Asfaram) and two other Kurdish men were shot
by Iranian security forces in Mahabad. According to
witnesses, the security forces then tied Qaderi’s
body to a Toyota jeep and dragged it through the
streets. Iranian authorities confirmed that Qaderi,
“who was on the run and wanted by the judiciary,”
was shot and killed while allegedly evading arrest.
For the next six weeks riots and protests erupted in
Kurdish towns and villages throughout eastern
Kurdistan such as Mahabad, Sinne (Sanandaj),
Sardasht, Piranshahr (Xanê), Oshnavieh (Şino), Baneh,
Bokan, and Saqiz (and even inspiring protests in
southwestern Iran and in Baluchistan in eastern
Iran). Scores were killed and injured, and an untold
number arrested without charge. The authorities also
shut down several major Kurdish newspapers,
arresting reporters and editors.
On 13 March 2006, Saleh Nikbakht, a well-known
Iranian human rights lawyer who was Qaderi’s
attorney, announced that Qaderi’s killer was a
member of the police who shot the victim illegally.
He added that the murderer and the one who ordered
the act were under investigation and the judiciary
system had so far been cooperative. Previously
government authorities had accused Qaderi of “moral
and financial violations”; Saleh Nikbakht rejected
all these allegations.
Kurds have suffered a long history of discrimination
in Iran. At the beginning of the twenty-first
century, a number of Kurdish activists, writers, and
teachers were arrested for their activities and
sentenced to death, while the Kurdish rebel group
Party for a Free Life in Kurdistan (PJAK) took up
arms against the state.
In November 2009, Iran executed Kurdish activist
Ehsan Fattahian – the first of over a dozen
political prisoners on death row – despite an
international campaign calling for his release. The
authorities had accused him of carrying arms for an
“illegal organization” and given him a prison term.
Fattahian never confessed to carrying arms. He was
neither given a fair trial nor access to his lawyer,
and the Komala – the illegal organization he was
accused of associating with – claimed he had left
the group a long time ago. When Fattahian attempted
to appeal, he was sentenced to death for “enmity
against God.” His execution was condemned by
international human rights groups and activists.
In January 2010, Iran executed a second Kurdish
political prisoner, Fasih Yasamani, for “enmity
against God.” Like Fattahian, Yasamani was tortured
and authorities tried to force him to confess but he
refused. He was also denied a fair trial.
Without notifying their families or lawyers, Iranian
authorities ordered the execution of five more
Kurdish political prisoners: Ali Heydarian, Farhad
Vakili, Mehdi Eslamian, Shirin Alam Hooli, and
Farzad Kamangar, a teacher who received much
international attention following his arrest on 9
May 2010. These five suffered severe torture and
were also demanded to confess their membership in
the illegal PJAK. None were given fair trials or
access to their lawyers. Amnesty International
described the executions as “a blatant attempt to
intimidate members of the Kurdish minority.” All the
activists denied any links to the PJAK, and its
leader denied any links to them.
Despite repeated international calls for the release
or retrial of these five political prisoners, all
were executed without prior notice. The Iranian
authorities refused to return their bodies to their
families.
As of May 2010, there were at least sixteen other
Kurdish political prisoners on death row. Not one
case has been reported as receiving a fair trial.
Syria
Kurds account for roughly 9 percent of Syria’s
population, a total of perhaps 1.6 million people.
This makes them the largest ethnic minority in the
country. They are mostly concentrated in the
northeast and the north, but there are also
significant Kurdish populations in Aleppo, Damascus,
and other urban centers. According to Syrian Kurdish
sources, there are two Kurdish neighborhoods in
Damascus that together have about 300,000
inhabitants. There is a much larger Kurdish
community in Aleppo,www.ekurd.net
where there are some 800,000 Kurds. Further eastward
of Aleppo there are large Kurdish population centers
like Qamishli near the Iraqi border. To the west of
Aleppo there are a number of mixed Kurdish-Alawi
villages.
Syrian Kurds often speak Kurdish in public, unless
those present do not. The Syrian Kurds speak
Kurmanji, like the Kurds of Turkey and the
northernmost areas of the KRG. According to Amnesty
International, Syrian Kurdish human rights activists
suffer persecution. No political parties are allowed
for any group, Kurdish or otherwise.
Most of the Kurds in Syria originally came from
Turkey in the 1920s. The community in Syria is quite
small compared to their compatriots in Iran, Iraq,
and Turkey. However, beginning in 1980, Kurds in
Syria changed their tactics. Violent clashes with
authorities resulted in mass arrests and deaths in
1986 and 1992.
During the 1970s and 1980s, the U.S. State
Department and CIA did not acknowledge the existence
of the Kurds in Syria. To this day the Syrian
government does not officially acknowledge their
existence. Given the lack of any transparent census
in Syria, it is difficult to assess their actual
percentage of the population.
Kurds mostly live in a geocultural region in
northeastern Syria. This area covers most of the
governorate of Al-Hasakah, also inhabited by many
Assyrians. The main cities in this region are Al-Qamishli
and Al-Hasakah. Another region with a significant
Kurdish population is Kobany (Ain al-Arab) in
northern Syria near the town of Jarabluss. In
Kurdish, the Kurdish-inhabited northern and
northeastern parts of Syria are called Kurdistana
Binxetê. An area of Kurdish concentration is Kurd-Dagh
in the northwest, around the town of Afrin in the
Aleppo governorate, a region that extends to the
Turkish districts of Islahiye and Kırıkhan. As
noted, many Kurds also live in metropolitan areas.
In 1957, the activists Osman Sabri and Daham Miro,
along with some Kurdish politicians, founded the
Kurdistan Democratic Party of Syria (KDPS). Its
objectives were to promote Kurdish cultural rights,
economic progress, and democratic change. KDPS was
never legally recognized by the Syrian state and
remains an underground organization, especially
since a crackdown in 1960 during which several of
its leaders were arrested, charged with separatism,
and imprisoned.
After the failure of the Syrian political union with
Egypt in 1961, Syria was declared an Arab Republic
in the interim constitution. On 23 August 1962, the
government conducted a special population census
only for the province of Jazira, which was
predominantly Kurdish. As a result, around 120,000
Kurds there were arbitrarily categorized as aliens.
In fact, the inhabitants had Syrian identity cards
and were told to hand them over for renewal.
However, those Kurds who submitted their cards
received nothing in return. Indeed, a media campaign
was launched against the Kurds with slogans such as
“Save Arabism in Jazira!” and “Fight the Kurdish
threat!”
These policies coincided with the beginning of
Barzani’s uprising in Iraqi Kurdistan and the
discovery of oil in the Kurdish-inhabited areas of
Syria. In June 1963, Syria took part in the Iraqi
military campaign against the Kurds by providing
aircraft, armored vehicles, and 6,000 troops. Syrian
soldiers crossed the Iraqi border and moved into the
Kurdish town of Zakho in pursuit of Barzani’s
fighters.
In 1962, 20 percent of Syria’s Kurdish population
was stripped of its citizenship following a
controversial census that raised the concern of
human rights groups. The Syrian government claimed
this move was necessary because groups of Kurds had
illegally infiltrated the Al-Hasakah governorate in
1945 from neighboring countries, especially Turkey.
The government said these Kurds had gradually
settled in cities of the region, such as Amuda and
Al-Qamishli, until they made up the majority in some
of them. The government also claimed that many Kurds
were able to enter themselves illegally onto the
Syrian civil registers. The government further
conjectured that Kurds aimed to acquire property,
especially after the agricultural reform law was
enacted, so as to benefit from land redistribution.
Human Rights Watch, however, asserted that the
government had lied in claiming that many of the
Kurds who were original inhabitants were foreigners,
and had violated their human rights by revoking
their Syrian citizenship.
On 5 October 1962, the government decided to conduct
a general census in the governorate. It claimed its
sole purpose was to purify registers and eliminate
alien infiltrators. As a result, the verified
details of Syrian citizens were included in the new
civil registers, while 100,000 Kurds were listed as
foreigners in special registers. Many others did not
participate in the census through choice or other
circumstances; they are known as “unrecorded.” Since
then the number of stateless Kurds in Syria has
grown; Refugees International puts it at about
300,000, but Kurds say it is even higher at 500,000.
A recent independent report has confirmed that there
are at least 300,000 stateless Kurds in the country.
In 1965, the Syrian government decided to create an
Arab cordon in the Jazira region along the Turkish
border. The cordon would be 300 kilometers (186
miles) long and 10 to 15 kilometers (6 to 9 miles)
wide, stretching from the Iraqi border in the east
to Ras al-Ain in the west. Implementation of the
plan began in 1973 as Bedouin Arabs were brought in
and resettled in Kurdish areas, while village names
were Arabized.
According to the original plan, some 140,000 Kurds
were to be deported to the southern desert near Al-Raad.
Although Kurdish farmers were dispossessed of their
lands, they refused to move and give up their
houses. Among these Kurdish villagers, those who
were designated as alien are not allowed to own
property, repair a crumbling house, or build a new
one. In Syria, other than in the Al-Hasakah
Governorate, foreigners cannot be employed in
government agencies and state-owned enterprises; nor
can they legally marry Syrian citizens. Kurds with
foreigner status cannot vote in elections or run for
public office, and when they attend universities
they are often persecuted and denied degrees.
Stateless Kurds in Syria also are not awarded school
certificates and often are unable to travel outside
of their provinces.
Kurdish human rights organizations and others decry
Syrian Arab racism and apartheid, especially against
the Kurdish minority. Techniques used to suppress
the Kurds’ ethnic identity include various bans on
the Kurdish language, refusing to register children
with Kurdish names, replacing Kurdish place names
with Arabic ones, and prohibiting businesses that do
not have Arabic names, Kurdish private schools, and
books and other materials written in Kurdish. Having
been denied the right to Syrian nationality, around
300,000 Kurds have been deprived of any social
rights, in violation of international law. These
Kurds are, in effect, trapped within Syria.
In March 2011, in part to prevent further unrest
from spreading across Syria, the government promised
to tackle the issue and grant Syrian citizenship to
these 300,000 Kurds. In April 2011, President Bashar
al-Assad signed Decree 49, which provides
citizenship for Kurds who were registered as
foreigners in Al-Hasakah. However, a recent
independent report indicates that the actual number
of stateless Kurds who have obtained national ID
cards since the decree does not exceed 6,000,
leaving the rest in limbo.
Following the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt,
activists used Facebook to declare 4 February 2011 a
“Day of Rage” in Syria. Few turned out to protest,
but among them were Kurds in the northeast of the
country. On 7 October 2011, Kurdish leader Mashaal
Tammo was gunned down in his apartment by masked men
widely believed to be regime agents. During Tammo’s
funeral procession the next day in Qamishli,
security forces fired into a crowd of more than
50,000 mourners, killing five. Tammo’s son, Fares,
asserted: “My father’s assassination is a nail in
the regime’s coffin. They made a big mistake by
killing my father.”
Indeed, beyond the issues of military-civilian
relations, the revolt against Assad will succeed
only if growing segments of the population join the
fight. One such group is the Kurds, who are already
sizably involved in the insurrection. Some even
assess that they hold the key to the fate of this
struggle, in which Kurds have taken part since its
outbreak. Tammo’s assassination hardened many Kurds’
resolve against the regime. Nevertheless, the Kurds
have been very suspicious of the anti-regime Syrian
National Council (SNC). The Kurds were denied proper
representation in the SNC’s council and general
assembly, receiving only 4 of 29 seats in the former
and 22 of 230 in the latter.
The Syrian revolt has undoubtedly prompted an
escalation of Kurdish demands in Syria. Many Kurds
speak of a “federal solution” for the country’s
future in which the Kurds acquire autonomy. The
Syrian Kurds are also reaching out to their Kurdish
neighbors. Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdish
Regional Government in northern Iraq, invited the
Syrian Kurdish parties to a meeting in Erbil, Iraq,
on 28 January 2012. The purpose of the meeting was
to call for the overthrow of the Assad regime,
against the advice of Iran and the PKK. By mid-July
2012, Kurdish sources were estimating that as many
as 9,000 Kurdish refugees from Syria were living in
camps in Iraqi Kurdistan.
At present, the Kurdish Regional Government in
northern Iraq is training Syrian Kurdish fighters to
help defend their territories within Syria. This was
confirmed by Massoud Barzani in late July. Barzani
has played an important role in brokering a
reconciliation agreement between the two main Syrian
Kurdish factions, the Kurdish National Council (KNC)
and the People’s Council for Western Kurdistan (PCWK).
He has also persuaded anti-Turkish Syrian Kurdish
factions to stop fighting Turkey and concentrate
their efforts against the Assad regime.
The internal politics of the Syrian Kurds pose a
special challenge for Turkey. One of the main
constituent organizations of the PCWR is the
Democratic Union Party (PYD), which has a close
affiliation with the PKK, the main Kurdish group
fighting Turkey and regarded as a terrorist
organization in the West. Some regard the PYD to be
a branch of the PKK. As noted earlier, the Free
Kurdish Army, which was operating in mid-2012 in
Syrian Kurdish towns, was formed by the PYD.
Ironically, Turkey’s policies toward Assad’s regime
have unleashed forces among the Syrian Kurds which
are inimical to Turkey’s own national security
interests.
Armenia
From the 1930s to the 1980s, Armenia was part of the
Soviet Union, within which Kurds, like other ethnic
groups, had the status of a protected minority.
Armenian Kurds were permitted their own
state-sponsored newspaper, radio broadcasts, and
cultural events. During the conflict in
Nagorno-Karabakh, many non-Yazidi Kurds were forced
to leave their homes since both the Azeri and non-Yazidi
Kurds were Muslim.
Azerbaijan
In 1920, two Kurdish-inhabited areas of Jewanshir
(capital Kalbajar) and eastern Zangazur (capital
Lachin) were combined to form the Kurdistan Okrug
(or Red Kurdistan). The Kurdish administrative unit,
however, did not last beyond 1929. Kurds
subsequently faced many repressive measures,
including deportations, imposed by the Soviet
government. The conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh has led
to the destruction of many Kurdish areas, and since
1988 separatist Armenian forces have deported more
than 150,000 Kurds.
Lebanon
The Kurds in Lebanon have not received public or
official attention except at times when young Kurds
were needed to fight a certain battle for a certain
area, or when Kurdish votes were needed by a local
leader. Virtually nothing has been published on the
Kurds in Lebanon, with the Kurdish community failing
to provide the necessary information. Kurds in
Lebanon are considered Sunni Muslims with no special
ethnic status. Before 1985 they were estimated to
number 60,000-90,000.
Georgia
In the early twentieth century, most Kurds
undergoing religious persecution in the Ottoman
Empire fled to the Russian Empire. The Kurds in
Georgia mainly live in Tbilisi, the capital, and in
Rustavi. Georgia’s Kurds enjoy a higher standard of
living than those in Turkey and Iran and face no
discrimination. The Kurds also have their own
schools, schoolbooks, and a printing press.
Illiteracy among them disappeared in the early
1900s. According to a United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees report from 1998, about 80
percent of Kurds in Georgia are Yazidis. Although
the community is politically neutral, in 1999 they
staged a huge demonstration in Tbilisi demanding
Ocalan’s release. The Kurds in Georgia use Cyrillic;
earlier, in the 1920s, they used the Latin script.
Diaspora
According to a report by the Council of Europe,
approximately 1.3 million Kurds live in Western
Europe, with roughly 800,000 Kurds in Germany alone.
The earliest immigrants were Kurds from Turkey who
settled in Germany, Austria, the Benelux countries,
Britain, Switzerland, and France in the 1960s.
During the 1980s and 1990s, Middle Eastern political
and social turmoil brought new waves of Kurdish
refugees to Europe, mostly from Iran and Saddam
Hussein’s Iraq. In recent years many Kurdish
asylum-seekers from both Iran and Iraq have settled
in the United Kingdom (especially in the town of
Dewsbury and in some northern areas of London),
sometimes sparking media controversy over their
right to remain. There have been tensions between
Kurds and the established Muslim community in
Dewsbury, which is home to very traditional mosques
such as the Markazi.
There has also been substantial Kurdish immigration
to North America, mainly as political refugees and
economic immigrants. An estimated 100,000 Kurds are
known to live in the United States, with 50,000 in
Canada and fewer than 15,000 in Australia.
Israel and the Kurds
Massoud Barzani said in 2005 that “establishing
relations between the Kurds and Israel is not a
crime since many Arab countries have ties with the
Jewish state.”
According to Eliezer Tsafrir, a former senior Mossad
official, during 1963-1975 Israel had military
advisers at the headquarters of Kurdish leader
Mustafa Barzani, and trained and supplied Kurdish
units with firearms, field artillery, and
antiaircraft guns. According to a former
director-general of
the Israeli Foreign Ministry, this was part of a
strategy of seeking alliances with other non-Arab
nations in the region. Pro-Kurdish feelings were
also reinforced by the assistance the Kurds provided
in the 1950s when Iraqi Jews were fleeing to Israel.
Israel’s clandestine relations with the Kurds were
officially acknowledged in 1980 by Prime Minister
Menachem Begin. He confirmed that Israel had sent
not only humanitarian aid but also military advisers
and weapons. Even today, the state-owned Israeli
communications company Bezek transmits evening
broadcasts on behalf of the KDP in northern Iraq.
During the First Gulf War, Jewish organizations
launched lobbying campaigns worldwide to aid the
Kurds in Iraqi Kurdistan and stop the government’s
persecutions there. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak
Shamir, during a meeting with U.S. Secretary of
State James Baker, called on the United States to
defend the Kurds.
In 1999, some Kurds accused the Mossad of providing
information that led to Ocalan’s arrest in Kenya.
Kurdish protesters in Berlin attacked the Israeli
embassy, and the Israeli security forces fired at
the crowd. Hundreds also stormed the Israeli
consulate, resulting in three protesters killed and
another sixteen protesters and twenty-seven police
officers wounded. Efraim Halevy, then head of the
Mossad, took the unprecedented step of publicly
disassociating Israel from Ocalan’s capture. The
Mossad does not usually comment publicly on
intelligence matters.
In 2004, Israeli media reported about Israeli
officials’ meetings with Kurdish political leaders
when Massoud Barzani, Jalal Talabani, and then-Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon publicly confirmed Israel’s
good relations with Iraqi Kurdistan.
According to Israeli newspapers, dozens of Israelis
with a background in elite combat training have been
working for private Israeli companies in northern
Iraq, helping Kurds there establish elite antiterror
units. Reports say that the Kurdish government
contracted Israeli security and communications
companies to train Kurdish security forces and
provide them with advanced equipment.
Motorola Inc. (which has a branch in Israel) and
Magalcom Communications and Computers have won
contracts with the Kurdish government to the tune of
hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars. The flagship
of these contracts is the construction of an
international airport in the northern Kurdish city
of Erbil, a stepping stone toward fulfilling Kurdish
aspirations for independence.
In addition to Motorola and Magalcom, a company
owned by Israeli entrepreneur Shlomi Michaels is in
full business partnership with the Kurdish
government, providing strategic consultation on
economic and security issues. The strategic
consultation company was initially established by
former Mossad chief Danny Yatom and Michaels, but
Yatom sold his shares upon his election to the
Knesset.
Tons of equipment, including motorcycles, tractors,
sniffer dogs, systems to upgrade Kalashnikov rifles,
bulletproof vests, and first-aid items have been
shipped to Iraq’s northern region, with most
products stamped “Made in Israel.”
The Kurds had insisted that the cooperation be kept
secret, fearing that exposure of the projects would
motivate terror groups to target their Jewish
guests. Recent warnings that Al-Qaeda might be
planning an attack on Kurdish training camps
prompted a hasty exit of all Israeli trainers from
the northern region. In response to the report, the
Defense Ministry said: “We haven’t allowed Israelis
to work in Iraq, and each activity, if performed,
was a private initiative, without our authorization,
and is under the responsibility of the employers and
the employees involved.”
Kurds in Israel
Jewish immigration from Kurdistan to Israel began in
the sixteenth century, with the initial Jewish
immigrants settling in Safed. Later on, Kurdish
Jewish immigrants arrived in the 1920s and 1930s,
and by 1948 there were some 8,000 Kurdish Jews in
Israel. After statehood was declared that year,
masses of Jews from all four parts of Kurdistan
moved to the country. Today Israel’s Kurdish Jewish
population numbers over 150,000, with the largest
concentration around Jerusalem. The Kurdish Jewish
immigrants have generally sustained the cultural
heritage of Jewish Kurdistan with their distinctive
cuisine, music, and traditions.
The Future of Kurdistan
For decades, both the United States and Israel have
been reluctant to support any manifestation of
Kurdish independence for fear of upsetting the
Turkish government. But given the increasing signs
of the political disintegration of the Iraqi state,
the outbreak of the Syrian revolt, and the
possibility of a concerted international action
against Iran’s nuclear facilities, understanding the
rapidly changing developments across Kurdistan has
become critical. Israel has no interest in assisting
a process of political disintegration and national
fragmentation in the Middle East. But at a time when
new groups are rising that seek political
expression, it would be a mistake to confine
Israel’s diplomatic contacts to nation-states alone,
which are losing their exclusive claim to represent
the peoples of the Middle East in this new era.
Notes
1. Claire Berlinski, “The Arab Spring Is Now the
Kurdish Spring,” Gatestone Institute, July 28, 2012,
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3215/the-arab-spring-is-now-the-kurdish-spring
2. Joe Parkinson, “Turkey Says It Would Act to Stop
Kurdish Rule in Syria,” July 26, 2012, Wall Street
Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444840104577550894290844680.html
3. Ibid.
4. Daren Butler, “Syrian Kurdish Moves Ring Alarm
Bells in Turkey,” July 24, 2012, Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/24/us-syria-crisis-turkey-kurds-idUSBRE86N12W20120724
5. David McDowall, A Modern History of the Kurds
(London: I.B. Taurus, 2007), p. 10.
6. Enis Senerdem, “Ankara-Baghdad Relations Tainted
by Kurdish Oil,” Journal of Turkish Weekly, July 26,
2012, http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/139339/ankara-baghdad-relations-tainted-by-kurdish-oil.html
7. “A Bigger Game,” Mideast Mirror, August 1, 2012,
mideastmirror.info
- Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah, a special
Middle East analyst at the Jerusalem Center for
Public Affairs, was formerly foreign policy adviser
to Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and deputy head for
assessment of Israeli Military Intelligence.
Copyright ©, respective
author or news agency,
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs |
www.jcpa.org
Top |
Kurd Net
does not take credit for and is not responsible for the
content of news information on this page
|
|
|