January
31, 2008
Judge Mohammed Oreibi al-Khalifa is a member of the
Iraq High Tribunal, which was created to prosecute
crimes that occurred under the regime of Saddam
Hussein.
Khalifa presided over the conviction of Saddam
Hussein and the so-called Anfal trial, which
specifically dealt with the crimes committed against
Iraqi Kurds.
The Anfal decision, as it is known, named six of
Saddam's highest officials as responsible for the
genocidal campaign that left hundreds of Kurdish
people dead. It also designated rape as a form of
torture. In one case Khalifa remembers the story of
a female prisoner whose baby died soon after she
gave birth.
The woman was not allowed to bury her child. Instead
she was forced to watch dogs rip its tiny body apart
and eat it. During a recent trip to Washington,
D.C., Khalifa spoke with Newsweeks's Jessica Ramirez
about the work of the Iraq High Tribunal. Excerpts:
NW: What brought you and
the other judges to Washington?
|

Judge Mohammed Oreibi
al-Khalifa is a member of the Iraq High Tribunal,
which was created to prosecute crimes that occurred
under the regime of Saddam Hussein.
|
|
Mohammed Oreibi
al-Khalifa: I am very happy to be in Washington—the
capital of the greatest country in the world. The
reason we're here is that we are delivering lectures
at many American universities regarding the Anfal
case. We wanted to give these lectures to college
students and American academics to explain the
specifics of the Anfal crimes and how we dealt with
them.
What kind of court is the
Iraq High Tribunal?
Our court is an exceptional court, in part, because
we are doing very specific work on crimes committed
by Saddam's regime. When that mission comes to pass
then the court will be dissolved.
The Global Justice Center,
which has recognized the Iraq High Tribunal's work
in the area of women's rights, had you meet Supreme
Court Justice Ruth Ginsberg. What did you discuss?
It was brief, but we learned about the high court in
America and the function of the constitution. We
talked about the kind of cases they have looked into
and jurisdiction. We discussed the number of judges
who preside and some history of the court.
They also facilitated a
visit to the Holocaust Museum. What did you think of
the museum?
The woman who explained what we were seeing talked
to us about how the property of the Jews was
confiscated. They destroyed their property, and then
the Jews were asked to compensate for the cost of
the destruction process. It was a double loss for
them. Saddam Hussein did the same. I will give you
an example. When Saddam used to execute certain
victims, he would send the body to the family of the
executed person. They would order the family of the
dead person not to weep and not to have any
ceremonial event for that death. The family must
also pay for the price of the bullets used to kill
the person. Frankly, we benefited a lot from what we
saw at the museum. I know,www.ekurd.net
of course, about the relationship between Hitler and
the Jews. But I didn't have the impression that it
was this barbaric or at this criminal level. I
concluded that dictatorship is the same everywhere.
What I have seen today happened in my country under
the Saddam regime. What I know is that man has a
right to life and a right to freedom. His rights
should be guaranteed whether he is a Jew, Christian
or Muslim. I was very impressed with the museum.
When you and the other
judges reviewed the information that led you to
believe rape was a form of torture in the Anfal
decision, what kind of stories helped you reach that
decision?
There were many. Kurdish women have suffered a lot.
When the ruling authorities at the time used to
arrest civilians, they would isolate women from men.
That was the first step. Then they would isolate
young men from old men. The young men would be taken
and killed. The elderly people would be taken to
stay with the women. Once this was done then they
would start investigations. The elderly ladies,
their investigation would not take a long time. The
investigation would be concentrated on the young
ladies. That is what court witnesses said. Some of
the elderly ladies told us that the investigators
would take some of the young women at night saying
they wanted to investigate them. In fact,www.ekurd.net
there was no investigation. They were being raped.
We asked the elderly women how they knew this. They
said that when the young ladies came back they told
that they were raped. Another elderly woman had seen
the rape occur through curtains. Those who were not
raped directly during the investigations were asked
to be naked and investigated in that manner. Another
witness we spoke to was arrested under the
accusation that he had used foul language against
the son of the president. He was beaten and
tortured. He was ordered to confess to being a
member of an opposition party. If he confessed he
was told he would be executed. He refrained. He was
a university student. So the security men resorted
to another way of getting him to confess. They
tortured him with electricity, pulled out his nails
and broke his bones. I believe he was even sexually
violated. As a means to force him to confess, they
brought his mother and sister. The security men then
raped them one after the other before him. They
expected him to confess, but he didn't. They
sentenced him to prison. He was released in 1990.
When he was released he found that his mother had
been executed. In 1991, during the events of the
uprising, he fled. So they executed his father, two
of his brothers and three sisters. He had no one
remaining. Every member of his family is dead.
Often, if a woman is raped,
a family member will kill her in order to restore
the family honor. Do you think Iraqis should change
their view of rape in general, and not just as it
pertains to crimes committed by Saddam's regime?
[Honor killing] happens when a family does not
understand and does not have a clear viewpoint of
what happened to their daughter. She is a victim.
How can she be a victim twice? Iraqi law does not
protect those who kill women that are raped. The
court should always be on the side of justice when
the woman is a victim.
You played a significant
role in the Saddam Hussein trial. During that time
at least one judge and three attorneys were killed.
What was life like for you then, and what is it like
for you now?
I have to tell you that a judge has a very difficult
life. To carry out his duties he should feel he is
safe and his family as well. The judge—Judge Perwez—he
sacrificed his life for justice and to move the Iraq
High Tribunal forward. During the Anfal case two of
my family members were killed, and my niece was
seriously injured. The government took precautions,
but this violence is the case for Iraqi people in
general. We are no exception.
What precautions have you
taken to remain safe?
The government has provided me with a residence in
the Green Zone—like other judges. Since the
government knows how dangerous my job is, the
government provides me with several guards as well.
How many guards do you
have?
I have at least 50 guards. The man who leads them is
my shadow. He is my companion everywhere.
What about your family?
They do not live in the Green Zone with me. Family
is very important. That's why we take all the
necessary measures to protect them. I will say that
they are in Iraq because we love Iraq. We cannot
leave Iraq.
Do you think you will ever be completely safe in
Iraq?
In this case, I am like other Iraqis. Every single
Iraqi's life is threatened at some point. But to
serve justice and Iraqis, I remain proud of my job.
I am not sorry for it, even if it means my life.
Are you afraid for your
life?
No.
Are you afraid for your
country?
Yes. Every person has priorities: himself, his
family, his homeland. In my case, my country is one
of my most important [priorities]. It is a great
country that deserves and needs to be loved.
newsweek com
Top |