®
Back - Home - About - E-mail

 Welcome to Kurd Net ® Add URL | Link to us
Web Hosting
Today in the History Chat Online News RSSFree stuffArchiveDownload
Arabic NewspapersCall KurdistanHistory of EventsMoney lineWallpapersGraphicsMusic Box
PersonalArt & MusicMiscellaneousOrganizationsDocumentaryPoliticsPress & Media


 

Want to place your banner here ? send email for details



Search Kurd Net, Keyword or URL

 Corruption in Kurdistan chokes innocent voices

 Source : UPI.Asia.Online
  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 


Corruption in Kurdistan chokes innocent voices  13.9.2007
By Heval Hylan







September 13, 2007

Kurdistan region (Iraq)

It is almost impossible to change any element in the Kurdish political culture and makeup without altering many others. The crisis is similar to several countries where institutions, especially federal governing structures tend to be mechanistic, inflexible, disjointed, and corrupt. And corruption does not allow innocent voices from being heard.

Positive ideas addressing the crisis of Kurdish institutions in term of an impending sociopolitical paradigm to a fresh framework may sound an earthquake to our leaders. What the Kurds really need is to wake-up to the many faces of the crisis, which the state is experiencing including institutional arrogance, greed, nepotism, and abuse of power. Taking action to solve the institutional crisis would be reassuring and even educational for them.

It is time the political system in Kurdistan is transformed and not reformed as the Kurdish people are in urgent need of something better and not something more. In other words, the healthier route is to transform leadership as a process of continuous change and growth. However, the majority leaders have arrangements with international companies to receive bribes for protecting their interests in the region. In such a scenario, they are unlikely to espouse positive changes necessary for the good of the country and its people.

According to Confucian writings, wise individuals wanting to be good leaders, look within them first and discipline them once they recognize and verbalize the innermost feelings of their heart. However, people find the Kurdish leaders to be the opposite and out of order. These leaders seek disciples within their family structures rather than working to discipline themselves. They are very skilled at covering-up peoples' daily needs and problems, which they believe can lead to popular resistance. By bringing more family members into the power pyramid, they clearly suppress freethinking of ordinary citizens in somewhat similar ways monarchy and dictatorial regimes indulge in.

Are the Kurdish leaders strong enough to break out of their Beehives? To liberate themselves from blurred glasses and personal family empires, they must learn to identify the crises and corruption first. A look at Newton's philosophy, "the best safeguard of ideas is a standing invitation to the whole world to prove them unfounded," is a good example for understanding the situation. Yes! If all Kurdish leaders except one held an opinion, and if that exception believed otherwise, then, others would have no more right to silence him than he would to silence the majority. As John Stuart Mill has pointed out that, many significant ideas have surfaced several times but their exponents have been persecuted before the same ideas were rediscovered in another point in time and age where people were more broadminded.

Mohandas K. Gandhi resolved the paradox of freedom by his revolutionary principle of "satyagraha" or non-violent resistance. Gandhi's principle is that those who reject solutions end up compromising their freedom and integrity. He turned the whole idea of power upside down when he visited a mountain hideout of an Indian militant and saw their guns. "You must be very frightened," he is believed to have said. Today, it is a shame to see hundreds of expensive vehicles, well-paid yet angry faces of guards, and modern weapons used for protecting a single leader.

We have to understand that the only way to treasure the benefits of federalism is to grant it to others, and the only means of collective self-determination is by majority rule. Unfortunately, in Kurdistan there is no room for others to participate, which deprives the people of true democracy.

Kurdish leaders must understand that people are not interested in war as the fight of the majority is to win their daily bread. Kurdish leaders are easily infected with war-fever, and it is not difficult to surmise their active instinct for hatred and destruction, which is amenable to such stimulations. Well, after enjoying a super luxury life, it is not difficult to identify the origins of their war impulses. Recent statements by Kurdish leaders are strong signals of their aggressive hunger for war.

Michael Howard, former leader of the British Conservative party once stated that the inhibitions on the use of violence between states are considerable. As much as that might be true, it is important to understand that they are not grounded merely on humanitarian considerations or on any formal respect for international law, but fundamentally rest on the most naked kind of self-interest. The use of violence between states as between individuals is often counter-productive and self-defeating as the Iraq war is proving to be.

In economic life, to desire goods or services is to desire the ability to buy them. As the leaders in Kurdistan spend money to buy what they want, so in politics they spend their power to get what they desire. The more they spend peoples' money, greater are their efforts searching for hiding places while spending their power renders them powerless.

If, as K.W.Deutsch stated that, in politics some men invest in power and spend their power on other values so that it brings more power back to them, then the principle of wealth and power in Kurdistan overrides all. Majority of the public have no voice, and if they did, then it has been dumped or threatened with death.

The leaders of Kurdistan blame the people for their country's woes much in line with the argument of St. Thomas who once said that, those attacked for some fault deserve the attack. The question is what really have the Kurdish people done to deserve being attacked and robbed of their wealth? In addition, are they prepared to take responsibility for their country's future?

(Heval Hylan is a Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand and an International Lawyer specialized in genocide cases. A human rights activist and General Secretary of the Refugee Council of New Zealand, he also writes legal and political papers. He is a founder and trustee of Reunity Trust Inc.)

upiasiaonline com  

Top

  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2008 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.