|
The Plan II - The Kurdistan Plot and The
Mother Of War
15.5.2007
By Daniel Neun
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2007
In Chapter I we have learned, that the Kurdish
intelligence - who had prior knowledge of the terror
attack in Ervil (Erbil) on May 09 - told papers
about an ongoing power struggle in the Kurdish Party
PUK of Iraqi Prime Minister Jalal Talabani between 2
factions. We know that the group "Islamic State of
Iraq" - which claimed responsibility for the
capturing of U.S. soldiers and also for the two
explosions in or near Kurdistan on May 09 and May 12
- has a supposed salafis leader called Khalid al-Mashhadani
and that HQs of that terror group had apparently
leaked to the Iraqi Government of Jalal Talabani.
We also heard from a strange meeting of Turkish
investors, Pentagon business managers and the
Kurdish Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani at a
groundbreaking ceremony for the construction of a
five-star luxury Kempinski hotel complex in Erbil (Erbil)
three days after a bloody terrorist attack (which
obviously didnīt occur as it was reported in the
media).
Now - letīs get back to the PUK.
NOSHIRWAN MUSTAFA - THE HINDRANCE OF WAR
Nawshirwan (Noshirwan) Mustafa is the only thinkable
successor of Jalal Talabani as chief of the PUK, and
he is still alive. This can change any moment.
Mustafa was the co-founder and until December 2006
the deputy secretary general and political bureau
member for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK).
He also is an intellectual. He broke the iron law of
politics and stepped down from power positions for
moral and political reasons.
He is currently planning to create an independent
Kurdish media centre in the city of Suleimani (Sulaymaniya)
in Southern Kurdistan.
That's where the security officials of his PUK
faction are being removed by Talabani. Can this
faction lead to fraction?
Shall this be averted? Or is there something
different on the agenda?
Just remember: Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani,
the PUK and KDP leaders, were cooperating closely
with the U.S. government and the U.S. Military
during the invasion of Iraq in 2003..
Prime Minister Nechirvan "the Nephew" Barzani has
been a few days in Tehran last week. He expressed
there the hope of increasing the level of security
cooperation between Iran and Kurdistan, and called
on Iran to invest more in Kurdistan's energy,
industry, and agriculture sectors.
"Our relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran are
long-standing and we have always been assisted by
the Islamic Republic whenever we have been in need
of help, especially during the hard days," Nechirvan
Barzani said.
And guess what the President of Iran, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, answered:
He said that Iran "feels no limit in extending
assistance to the Iraqi people and the Kurdish
population in particular."
And Barzani continued:
"The issue of security is a mutual and bilateral
issue and not unilateral," he told reporters in
Tehran. "The thing is that we consider Iran's
security as our security. And I think, and am sure,
that the Islamic Republic of Iran regards our
security as its security as well."
Isn't that interesting? Especially regarding the
comments of "other attempts along" the
Kurdish-Iranian border and "the movements of some
terrorist organizations" there, made by the Kurdish
intelligence close to the PUK faction of Noshirwan
Mustafa?
According to wikipedia, in 2005-2006 Noshirwan
Mustafa started a process of reform in the electoral
system of PUK aiming to increase democracy within
the party, end nepotism and to both allow and
encourage the younger generation of Kurds to become
actively involved in Kurdish politics.
However due to differences and strong resistance
from other factions of the PUK, especially that of
Jalal Talabani, the process of reform failed.
Consequently Mustafa resigned from his post and is
working along new paths to implement reform within
Kurdistan and Kurdish politics, and end the current
reign of corruption and nepotism.
After the recent scare over Jalal Talabanis health,
Nawshirwan Mustafa has been recognized as the only
feasible successor for the position of secretary
general of the PUK (Patriotic Union of Kurdistan).
THE SPY IN SADDAMīS PALACE
One of the most important issues about the U.S. led
invasion of Iraq is the proven - but widely unknown
- fact, that at that time the Foreign Minister of
Saddamīs Iraq, Naji Sabri, was a CIA informant.
For a short time before the 2003 invasion, the CIA
maintained French-sponsored, third-party contact
with Sabri. In exchange for $100,000, Sabri offered
the agency important details on some of Saddam's
alleged weapons programs and assurances on the
discontinuance of others.
Sabri told the CIA that Saddam had stockpiled
certain chemical weapons, specifically "poison gas."
In the lead-up to the invasion, the CIA pressured
Sabri to defect to the United States, but Sabri
declined. Communication between Sabri and the agency
ceased thereafter.
Somehow he made it out of Iraq and found a safe
passage to Syria and then Cairo.
Nobody actually knows where he is now.
In any case, the US military did not include Sabri
in the "deck of cards" featuring the most-wanted
Iraqi suspects.
And there is something else.
Something very, very disturbing.
THE UNTHINKABLE
December 7, 2005 Rep. John Murtha, a respected
veteran of the Vietnam War, holds a news conference
to respond to a speech of President Bush.John Murtha
starts with a timeline of the U.S. invasion of Iraq
in 2003. He talks about the credibility of the U.S.
executive branch. He talks about the lack of ground
equipment for U.S. troops.
He is questioned by reporters.
And then he is getting angry...
"But the point is that the public doesn't believe
them (the Bush Government). And if the public
doesn't believe them and the allies don't believe
them, how are we going to have an international
coalition to be able to have a significant influence
on what goes on inside Iraq?"
John Murtha goes on, even more angry:
"So I'd fire somebody. I'd fire two or three people.
I'd fire a number of people who are involved in this
thing. And then I would go forward with the
international community, trying to get support from
them in a diplomatic efforts, as our troops move out
of there."
Then he says something, nobody ever will talk about.
Itīs not mentioned anywhere in the World Media, and
he never repeated it again...
"Now, why don't I believe them when they say
anything? They said we got weapons of mass
destruction. They said we got an Al Qaida
connection. They said we got nuclear weapons. They
said we cross this red line which surrounds Baghdad
AND WEīRE GOING TO HAVE A WAR WITH THEM"(15) ...
THE RED LINE
In fact, there were reports in Germany about this.
April 03, 2003:
The German "Tagesschau" cites in its timeline, "U.S.
and British troops approach the `red line` around
Baghdad in overalls. According to U.S. intelligence
information's U.S. troops has to calculate with the
exertion of poison gas by the Iraqi Army in case of
crossing the `red line`." (16)
In German TV News late that day, on "Tagesthemen", a
graphic appears - it shows Baghdad placed in some
sort of red circle, the "Red Zone" as it says.
Never before, and never after that very point of
time this word or this graphic appear again in
German news or TV reports.
An "attack with chemical weapons" on U.S. troops by
Iraqi forces cannot be excluded, it says.(17)
April 04, 2003:
American forces, who easily overwhelmed the
Republican Guards before Baghdad, take the Baghdad
Airport and then stop.
Iraq's information minister is talking about
"non-conventional attacks" on American soldiers on
Iraqi TV and demands a "kind of martyrdom
operations".(18)
A man who looks like Saddam Hussein - who possessed
a serious amount of doubles (19) - appears on the
streets of Baghdad while smoke is already rising on
the horizon.
At this point of time the CIA informant and Iraqi
Foreign Minister Sabri has already publicly arrived
in safe Damascus.(14)
On late "Tagesthemen" TV news in Germany Tom Buhrow,
the foreign correspondent in Washington says, the
U.S. Forces would calculate "roughly" with an attack
by chemical weapons of mass destruction and suicide
bombings.(20)
The U.S. troops stay where they are, for 3 days,
right before Baghdad. A lot of news reports tell
from chemical weapons which have been found near of
the Iraqi capital.
Then the U.S. Army marches into Baghdad.
The Iraqi security forces dissappear from one moment
to the other, all hellīs breaking loose. Chaos
reigns in the streets.
The "fictitious" war is over.
The real one has begun.
January 31, 2003:
The Washington Times reports that a classified
document signed by President Bush specifically
allows for the use of nuclear weapons in response to
biological or chemical attacks, apparently changing
a decades-old U.S. policy of deliberate ambiguity.
"The United States will continue to make clear that
it reserves the right to respond with overwhelming
force `including potentially nuclear weapons` to the
use of (weapons of mass destruction) against the
United States, our forces abroad, and friends and
allies," the document, National Security
Presidential Directive (NSPD) 17, set out on Sept.
14 2002, the Washington Times reports.
A similar statement is included in the public
version of the directive, which was released Dec. 11
2002 as the National Strategy to Combat Weapons of
Mass Destruction and closely parallels the
classified document. However, instead of the phrase
"including potentially nuclear weapons," the public
text says, "including through resort to all of our
options."
William M. Arkin, a military analyst, wrote in the
Los Angeles Times
earlier that week that the Bush administration's war
planning "moves nuclear weapons out of their
long-established special category and lumps them in
with all the other military options."
Mr. Arkin quoted "multiple sources" close to the
preparations for a war
in Iraq as saying that the focus is on "two possible
roles for nuclear
weapons: attacking Iraqi facilities located so deep
underground that they might be impervious to
conventional explosives; and thwarting Iraq's use of
weapons of mass destruction." (21,22)
Now exchange a simple letter - and you got it...
It's the same war. It's still the same government.
It's still the same military.
But something has changed - the commander.
radio-utopie.de.
Top |
Kurd Net
does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news
information on this page
|
Ū 