®
Back - Home - About - E-mail

 Welcome to Kurd Net ® Add URL | Link to us
Web Hosting
Today in the History Chat Online News RSSFree stuffArchiveDownload
Arabic NewspapersCall KurdistanHistory of EventsMoney lineWallpapersGraphicsMusic Box
PersonalArt & MusicMiscellaneousOrganizationsDocumentaryPoliticsPress & Media


 

Want to place your banner here ? send email for details



Search Kurd Net, Keyword or URL

 Report: Biden supports three-part Iraq split

 Source : The News Journal - delaware.online
  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 


Report: Biden supports three-part Iraq split  4.3.2007
By CRIS BARRISH

 




















Plan maintains limited central government

March 4, 2007


Les Gelb had eased into his seat on a jet from New York to Washington late in 2005 when U.S. Sen. Joe Biden unexpectedly plopped down next to him.

Biden, then gearing up for a presidential run, was just the man Gelb -- a veteran journalist and diplomat -- needed to see.

For more than two years, Gelb had been pushing a plan that would split Iraq into three self-governing regions -- Kurd, Shiite and Sunni -- with a limited central government in Baghdad overseeing border defense, oil revenues and matters such as health.

Despite publishing pieces in major newspapers and delivering numerous speeches, Gelb's plan had languished. "I was pitching it all over the place, making no converts among foreign policy people," Gelb said. "Running into Biden was like a dream."

Their plane got delayed on the runway, so the two foreign policy wonks spent three hours hashing over the idea. By the time they landed in D.C., the two had agreed to join forces.

Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, is the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Leslie H. Gelb is the president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. Gov website
Photo: AFP
Today, as Biden's quest for the White House has begun in earnest, the road map he and Gelb unveiled nine months ago is being hailed by many academics and foreign affairs authorities as the best hope for Iraq, where sectarian warfare is raging, thousands of residents are fleeing and suicide bombers launch almost daily attacks.

With recent polls showing most Americans believe invading Iraq was a mistake and President Bush's recent decision to send more troops into battle zones is a bad one, candidates' positions on the conflict could play a deciding role in the 2008 presidential campaign. In a nationwide CBS poll last month, 87 percent called a candidate's stance on Iraq the most important or an important issue.

Supporters of the Biden-Gelb plan include Richard Holbrooke, architect of the 1995 peace accords in the former Yugoslavia and later U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Last month, during hearings chaired by Biden, former U.S. secretaries of state Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright had kind words.

"I'm sympathetic to an outcome that permits large regional autonomy," Kissinger told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Not everybody is enamored.

Nearly four years after invading Iraq, Bush's focus is on Operation Jumpstart -- sending 21,500 more troops into Iraq.

Phoebe Marr, author of "The Modern History of Iraq," thinks the Biden-Gelb plan is too simplistic because Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds have several internal factions fighting for supremacy.
"The assumption that these groups are homogeneous is erroneous," Marr said in a telephone interview from her Florida home. "They are divided between parties, generations, tribal groups and so on. The Sunni and Shia are very fragmented. And wrapping religious and these identity politics around regions as a strategy is extremely dangerous."

Biden would like to hear critics' alternatives. Meanwhile, he opposes Bush's troop surge and is pressing for a resolution to repeal the 2002 resolution authorizing U.S. military force and limit military options.

"It's better to have a unified national government. But I don't think there's any possibility of that happening," he said.

'Only way to go'

Biden and Gelb, president emeritus of the nonpartisan Council on Foreign Relations, introduced their five-point plan for Iraq in a May 2006 op-ed piece in the New York Times.

"The sectarian genie is out of the bottle and no number of American troops can put it back in," the duo wrote. "Militias are the law in swaths of Iraq and death squads kill dozens daily. ... The new government of national unity will not stop this dangerous deterioration."

Beyond the three regional governments, the key proposal is to give Sunnis 20 percent of oil revenues. Sunnis make up about 20 percent of Iraq's 27 million residents, yet the the west-central part of Iraq, which Sunnis dominate, has no oil.

Shiites make up about 60 percent of Iraqis and control the new government. Sunnis, who ran the country under Saddam, are now on the outside, spearheading the insurgency. The Kurds, who rule the north, already have their own semiautonomous system.

Other facets of the plan:

•Provide more U.S. reconstruction aid, and insist that other countries, especially oil-rich ones, do the same.

•Convene a regional security conference in which Iran and other neighbors pledge to respect Iraq's borders.

•Withdraw most U.S. soldiers by the end of 2007, keeping perhaps 20,000 to strike terrorists, monitor borders and train security forces.

The White House criticized the idea immediately after it was presented.

"We remain committed to a federal, democratic, pluralist and unified Iraq in which there is full respect for political and human rights," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said then. "A partition government with regional security forces and a weak central government ... is something that no Iraqi leader has proposed, and that the Iraqi people have not supported."

Those who support the plan argue that it is not a partition of one country into three.

"It's the only way to go, a political power-sharing arrangement in a country which cannot have central governance," Holbrooke said. "Either the country splits apart, which is really dangerous, or it shares power. This is really a visionary plan."

Qubad Talabani: The centralized government has failed since its inception

Qubad Talabani, the Washington representative of the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq, endorses the concept, though he envisions more than three regions. Talabani's father, Jalal, is Iraq's president, a largely ceremonial post.

Biden pointed out that Iraq's constitution "allows for the creation of federal regions." The document was approved overwhelmingly in a vote of nearly 10 million citizens in 2005.

"Whether it's three regions or five regions or 15 regions, this is a technicality that will be left to Iraqis on the ground," Talabani said. "What we need is a system of governance such that a multi-ethnic, sectarian society can live with one another. The centralized government has failed since its inception."

Sharing billions of dollars in oil revenues could ease Sunni opposition, Talabani said.

"It's critical to this plan," he said. "We need checks and balances in place to ensure all regions will get their fair share."

Creating the regions -- perhaps even making Baghdad its own region -- could hasten the peace process, Talabani said.

"Baghdad is the prize. That's why everybody is fighting for it," he said. "Regionalization will lessen its significance."

'Fight isn't out of them'

Violence by religious and ethnic factions and militias, criminal gangs and insurgents keeps pushing peace to the back burner, though.

"Their plan is a wonderful template for an optimal political settlement," said Anne-Marie Slaughter, dean at Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. "But they don't have a way and I'm not sure any of us have a way to get the parties to the table to endorse that settlement."

The warring factions -- with the U.S. troops in the line of fire -- will likely continue fighting, Slaughter said, "until one party gets a decisive edge."

Slaughter recommended setting a withdrawal deadline -- perhaps the end of 2008, as Democratic candidate Barack Obama has suggested, to spur Iraqis to "end this civil war."

Biden and Gelb see parallels in Iraq to Bosnia and Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, where war-weary factions decided to divide land along ethnic lines: separate areas for Serbs and a Muslim-Croat federation. A fragile peace still holds, more than a decade later.

Slaughter said it appears Iraqi factions are not yet ready to broach such a deal. "We have not found a way," she said, "to get the parties to conclude they have more to gain from talking. We could get them to that point by saying we are withdrawing."

Holbrooke agreed the plan's prospects have diminished since its introduction nine months ago: "Every passing cycle gets more difficult."

'No magical solution'

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said residents of Iraq have the right to decide whether they want a unified nation.

"I'm reticent to endorse," he said, "what clearly would be three countries."

Another knock against the three-region plan is that Baghdad, Kirkuk and other cities with diverse ethnic and religious populations might never rally around a single identity -- Shiite, Sunni or Kurd.

"That's the major obstacle," Gelb said. "That's where the fighting is going on, in major cities that are mixed."

Sen. Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat also eyeing the presidency, said the Biden-Gelb plan might ultimately be the path Iraqis choose. "It may break down to that," said Dodd, who fears such a division might lead Iraq's neighbors to attack one or more regions and expand the fighting.

"There are no good solutions here, no magical solution to this thing," Dodd said. "I don't think it really exists."
Bruce Riedel, a Middle Eastern scholar at the nonpartisan Brookings Institution, said the only feasible solution for America is a total pullout.

The Biden-Gelb plan, Riedel said, is flawed because the country "doesn't nicely fit into regions which are ethnically homogeneous."
Nor are factions "ready to split the pie," he said. "They all have designs to be bigger rather than smaller."

Riedel thinks America should gradually withdraw troops over the ensuing months and opt for "a robust diplomatic approach."
The pullout, he contends, must be total. "If you are going to have an exit strategy, the most important part is to exit," Riedel said. "You shouldn't be loitering in the door."

Biden, though, believes the plan he and Gelb forged on a tarmac can lead to peace. "This is the only chance," Biden said, "to leave without having traded a dictatorship for chaos."

delawareonline com 

Top

  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2008 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.