®
Back - Home - About - E-mail

 Welcome to Kurd Net ® Add URL | Link to us
Web Hosting
Today in the History Chat Online News RSSFree stuffArchiveDownload
Arabic NewspapersCall KurdistanHistory of EventsMoney lineWallpapersGraphicsMusic Box
PersonalArt & MusicMiscellaneousOrganizationsDocumentaryPoliticsPress & Media


 

Want to place your banner here ? send email for details



Search Kurd Net, Keyword or URL

 The division bell is ringing in Iraq?

 Source : VOI
  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 


The division bell is ringing in Iraq?  2.10.2007







October 2, 2007

Erbil-Hewler, Kurdistan region 'Iraq',-- "Why not? It seems a nice solution," suggested a bookshop owner in Erbil, the capital of the autonomous Iraqi Kurdistan region, with bright eyes and a smile from ear to ear.

"Since 1991, we became accustomed to having Iraqi Kurdistan as a special entity. We can never live under a central government again after the years we tasted a semi-independent status," said Farouq Jamil.

Iraqis from different areas in the war-troubled nation mirrored the acute splits among the political parties over a recent U.S. Congressional proposal to "divide Iraq into federal entities on ethnic and sectarian basis."

Some thought that the proposal might lead to a "solution" for the country's security predicament, while others warned that it could be "a gateway to more chaos and fiercer conflicts."

Aram Ali, a student, said the U.S. resolution is an "optimal solution to the Iraqi problem. Kurdistan, with its security and stability, is a case in point because it is ethnically harmonious and the Kurds are a majority there."

"The same thing applies to southern Iraq areas of predominantly Shiite inhabitants, while unrest is focused in the areas where Shiites and Sunnis mix," Ali said.

The U.S. Senate, during a late hour on Wednesday, had approved with a majority of 75 votes to 23 a draft resolution on the division of Iraq as a bid to "end the acts of violence sweeping the nation."

The plan provides for dividing Iraq into three Shiite, Kurdish and Sunni entities with a federal government in Baghdad undertaking matters pertaining to border security and oil revenues.

The resolution drew outcries and reactions at local and international levels. While it was welcomed by the Iraqi Kurdistan region's presidency, it was met with strong objection on the part of the Iraqi government, the Shiite Unified Iraqi Coalition (UIC) and the Sunni Association of Muslim Scholars (AMS).

Since 1991, the Kurds of Iraq achieved self-rule in part of the country. Today's teenagers are the first generation to grow up under Kurdish rule. Most Kurds don’t speak Arabic, especially the younger generation. Kurdistan region has all the trappings of an independent state -- its own constitution, its own parliament, its own flag, its own army, its own border, its own border patrol, its own national anthem, its own education system, its own International airports, even its own stamp inked into the passports of visitors.

France, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries also warned against the consequences of such a resolution.In Baghdad, Basem Hamza, a journalist, said some Iraqi political powers have heralded a federacy of ethnicities and sects before the U.S. Senate even thought about it.

"The parties rejecting the proposal should have criticized the Iraqi parties before they denounced the U.S. plan to divide Iraq," said Hamza.

Bahaa Haddad, a political analyst, said the Congress resolution was just "sheer support for an old demands by Shiite and Kurdish leaders. "The resolution was just a confirmation of earlier agreements signed in London in 2002 before the ouster of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein," said Haddad.

Haddad said he found it rather strange that some Kurdish and Shiite politicians objected the Congress' resolution. "They have always demanded independent Kurdish and Shiite entities," he said.

Inaam, a civil servant in the predominantly-Shiite oil-rich port city of Basra, had some fears the resolution could be a prelude to the disintegration of her country. "If federal division is going to bring about security, then it is ok. But, if it is meant to disintegrate Iraq, we'll never accept it,"
she said.

In Karbala, a human rights activist, Samir Hadi, was wondering why Iraqis – with all this violence and killing – would not accept something that preserves their lives in the first place.
"They (Iraqis) can think of the nation's unity and wealth later," stressed Hadi.

A civil society activist who described himself as secular said he was concerned the resolution might open the door wide before the interference of Iran and other regional powers.

"The circumstances now are not favorable for such a proposal. The country is weak and suffers from interferences by Iran and other regional powers. In a nutshell, the establishment of a federal entity in the south would mean the extension of the vilayat-e-faqih (Guardianship of an Islamic Jurist in neighboring Shiite Iran) there. The same thing could apply to other entities," he said.

Raed al-Azzawi, a writer, called on the Americans to bear in mind that Sunnis in Syria, Kurds in Turkey and Arabs in Iran might demand their own federal ethnic or sectarian entities if this federacy model was applied in Iraq.

"The division in this state of affairs might flare up the situation in the area, a matter that prompted America's friends in the Middle East to object the resolution," said Azzawi.

Dr. Abdul-Amir al-Faysal, a university professor from Baghdad, said America started carrying out previously-made plans to break Iraq into small entities. Amer Hassan Fayyad, the dean of the political sciences college in the University of Baghdad, described the resolution as "one entrenching an already-existing sectarianism," adding "the resolution is a conspiracy to federacy."

Fayyad pointed out that the Iraqi constitution has already left a space for forging a federal model in accordance with developed criteria. "Why then should we speak about the sectarian bases of federacy?" he wondered. Haydar, a student in the University of Basra, said sectarian violence might end if the Shiites were separated from the Sunnis.

"But who would separate between the parties in inter-Shiite and inter-Sunni conflicts whose signals began to appear in Basra, Karbala, al-Anbar and other provinces," wondered Haydar.

He said these conflicts over wealth have begun to take a sectarian dimension but they would soon develop to become inter -sect disputes.

"As long as the state is frail, there are no guarantees that a sectarian federacy could bring an end to violence in Iraq," said Haydar.

Hadi of Karbala challenged Iraqi officials to indicate one single mixed area that enjoys security.

"Baghdad is already divided on a sectarian basis at this moment. What comment should we make then on the U.S. Congress' resolution," Hadi asked, knitting his brows in despair.

VOI 

Top

  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2008 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.