®
Back - Home - About - E-mail

 Welcome to Kurd Net ® Add URL | Link to us
Web Hosting
Today in the History Chat Online News RSSFree stuffArchiveDownload
Arabic NewspapersCall KurdistanHistory of EventsMoney lineWallpapersGraphicsMusic Box
PersonalArt & MusicMiscellaneousOrganizationsDocumentaryPoliticsPress & Media


 

Want to place your banner here ? send email for details



Search Kurd Net, Keyword or URL

 Turkish irony, militarist approaches and Kurdistan "North-Iraq"

 Source : Vladimir van Wilgenburg
  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 


Turkish irony, militarist approaches and Kurdistan "North-Iraq" 9.12.2006 
By Vladimir van Wilgenburg, a non-Kurdish writer from Netherlands

 





December 9, 2006

It would be a wrong step by the United States to redeploy some of its forces to Iraq's Kurdish-controlled north, said a former Turkish ambassador to Washington ahead of the release of a key report by a top-level commission probing U.S. strategic options in Iraq.

“I believe that repositioning any U.S. bases would be a wrong step by the United States and a wrong choice by the Kurds in northern Iraq. It would be a constant source of tension and problems. … It would give no comfort to anyone,” retired Ambassador Faruk Loğoğlu, now head of the Ankara-based think tank the Eurasia Strategic Studies Center (ASAM), told a panel late on Tuesday.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, speaking to Turkish reporters en route to Iran over the weekend, voiced opposition to a possible U.S. move to redeploy some forces in Iraq to the north. “I personally find the shifting of U.S. forces to northern Iraq to be wrong. There is no problem in northern Iraq. The United States should keep its soldiers in areas with problems,” Erdoğan said.

A senior political analyst, in his address to the same panel at the Turkish-American Association, voiced criticism of the U.S. policies in Iraq, saying the United States was following the same policy in Iraq that its ally Israel pursued in the Middle East.

“This is a militarist approach. The United States only focused on troops. This is the key mistake in Iraq. If the United States continues to pursue a military approach, we'll [continue to experience what we've experienced over the past three years] in the near future in Iraq,” said Sedat Laçiner, head of the Ankara-based International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO/USAK).

In comments on the strong need to restore stability overall in the Middle East, Laçiner said: “If you want a new Middle East we need to win the hearts of people” and added it was not possible to restore stability in the region without the people's support. “The Middle East needs a miracle, a success story, not a leader. A European Union-member Turkey can be a great success and also put an end to the victimization of not only the Middle Easterners but also the Muslim world,” he added.

Source: Turkish Daily News-Iraqi Turkmen Front

There is some irony in the words of these Turkish gentlemen. Erdogan says there is no problem in "Northern-Iraq". This while Turkish army clearly thinks that the PKK is a big problem in “North-Iraq”. If there is no problem in Iraqi-Kurdistan, why Turkey keeps asking America to solve the “PKK-problem” in Northern-Iraq? Why the military warned the Turkish government then about “formation of a de facto Kurdish state in northern Iraq under the mandate of the U.S” (See TNA)? It is clear Erdogan and the ambassador doesn’t want the formation of a Kurdish state under the mandate of the US army.

If the US or NATO army goes to Iraqi-Kurdistan, then Turkey can’t do nothing against a Kurdish state. However, something could be done against the PKK rebels then. Rasti thinks this is a ploy to put Turkish troops there. But why Erdogan and his other Turkish cronies are against this?

Another joke are the words of Sedat Laçiner. He says that the US only focuses on troops and a militarist approach. Isn't this what the Turkish government is doing with the Kurdish issue? Isn't Turkey pursuing the same strategy as Turkey and Israel? Shouldn’t the Turkish government try to win the hearts of the Kurds? Why the military never accepted a ceasefire or an IRA/ETA solution for the PKK issue? Why the army has so much power in Turkey? Why the army is so important in Turkey?

But we should know what to expect from the lectures of the Turkish-American Association. The same association that is busy with benefiting of wars explained by Sibel Edmonds in the article called “THE HIGHJACKING OF A NATION”:[1], [2]. These gentlemen should look in the mirror.

One thing someone should explain me. Is the PKK ceasefire over? Or is this news: Turkish army blames outlawed PKK for helicopter crash and Kurdish Rebel Mine Blasts Kill 3 Turkish Soldiers, “Turkish propaganda”.

vladimirkurdistan.blogspot.com   

Top

  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2008 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.