|
For
how long the nation of Kurds must bleed by the few
usurper vultures until the Civilized World decides
to recognize them as an Independent state? Or are
the Kurds to remain in the same bloody quagmire for
another 84 years, even now that all freedom loving
nations agree; that South Kurdistan should have been
declared Independent once the manufactured Iraq of
the1920s was finally Liberated on April 2003.
As Kurds have made it clear; Kurdistan is not Iraq
now nor was it ever considered to be under Arab
Iraq, as this was the British and Frances idea,
partitioning it into Four parts against the League
of Nations Treaty of Serves and after Genocides were
committed by their new agent [Turkeys murderous
Kemal Ataturks regime], when Kurdish political
Leaders in North Kurdistan were eliminated one by
one, and as Great Britain with its air power also
attacked Sheikh Mahmood and his freedom fighters in
South Kurdistan.
As noted in the documentary at the end of this
article; Great Britain even used chemical weapons in
Iraq.
Mr. Jaafari is causing Obstruction of Justice in
implementing TALs article 58:
Mr. Jaafari as PM in the new Arab Government must
pay close attention to his speech.
It appears that Mr. Jaafari and many other World
Leaders have once again turned a blind eye on the
very existence of the great nation of South
Kurdistan and Kurdish people for reasons too obvious
to ignore, and no doubt, influenced by a centralized
International Corporate worlds senseless guidance he
fears to disobey, unless otherwise he is acting on
his own or on behalf of other Iraq and pan-Arab
Leaders.
This Corporate World neither has the wisdom nor is
it capable of caring, lacking a human face, rather
it is the driving force behind the New World Order,
and its new version of Colonialism morphed as its
clone known to have become: Globalization.
In short, The Corporate World is only after economic
gains. It uses our superpowers leadership to carry
out its demands as if they were toys operated with
remote control in their Corporate World hands, which
has always been a hidden entity with often hastily
known figureheads, whose identities have been
conveniently concealed by the articulate worlds
Controlled major Media. The same Media, which has
been fabricating a title for Kirkuk and call it: the
little Iraq; to distort its pure and true Kurdish
territorial identity, fueling a civil war against
Kurds, while promoting another false political
analogy; that Turkey and Iran are to attack Kurds of
South Kurdistan if it is declared an Independent
State.
What a childish analogy; while Iran prays to be
spared of a possible air strike campaign against its
nuclear facilities, and Turkey must stay clean as a
civilized and peaceful state to get its chance of EU
membership, let alone suggesting of acts as an
aggressive neighbor, whod invade the Sovereign
nation of South Kurdistan if it becomes an
independent state.
This is only one example of Kurdish peoples enemies
busy minds at work, spreading not only false rumors,
and then apologize, but also making mind boggling
analogies.
Turkey & Iran would become more secure with an
independent S. Kurdistan:
Turkey and Iran would have no reason to interfere
with the Independence of S. Kurdistan, because they
would immediately become targets for illegal
invasions, dealt with by U.S. and other U.N. member
states, and also face the stiffest Kurdish
resistance. It would clearly be a political suicide
for both regimes, as well as a foolish and
unprovoked war regardless of having Kurdish citizens
under their present territorial jurisdiction or not.
Those enemies of Kurds have tried to paint a low
opinion of Kurdish culture and its peace loving
people. What makes them believe; that there has to
be independence for the other three parts of
Kurdistan at once, when each can thrive for their
own independence or autonomy on their own. Do we
have one Independent Arab state? No, in fact there
are a total of 22 Arab states. In addition to that;
Kurds of S. Kurdistan have been virtually
Independent since 1992. Therefore, the few paid
reporters and their news agencies should get their
facts straight or they too shall be brought to
international courts of Justice as dishonorable
journalists practicing irresponsible and malicious
dissemination of the news and macabre political
gibberish at attempts to start new wars.
One last thing: Those world leaders, including some
from our own U.S. administration, putting Kurdish
leaders on the spot to say or do things against
their Kurdish national identity best be certain;
that this time Kurds will not fall into the same
trap as in the past.
The forced idea of not flying only the Kurdish flag
in the recent opening day of Kurdish Parliament and
pronouncement of Iraq rather than Kurdistan have and
will continue to be an out loud disgrace by any
nation, which appears not to have its own sense of
identity clearly recognized, hence demeaning that of
one of the proudest nations, the Kurds.
The same Kurds, whose homeland has been unjustly
partitioned by the same coward usurpers with
established military and governments, ganging up on
the single peace loving Kurdish nation, which has
stood up on its own feet, surviving in the continued
84 years of wars and crimes against humanity brought
upon the precious Kurds since 1915 by the aforesaid
Uncivilized and Vulture States claiming as
civilized; merely to steal Kurdish oil from Kirkuk
and control Kurdish water resources of Tigris and
Euphrates.
The key question remaining is that: Will they ever
learn from their evil deeds, and use civilized
ideas, or are they all slaves to their own greed and
that of their masters: the Corporate World, causing
collateral damages to appease their Globalization
agendas?
By allowing the birth of two new nations of S.
Kurdistan in the North, and Arabistan in the South;
the peace and security in the region for this two
war torn nations will be permanent. This is the only
way possible to stop the insurgencies, and eradicate
the flow of foreign fighters from entering into the
unsecured borders.
Once again, as I wrote in my last years related
article, mark my words for it: This is the best
solution for all parties. The Kurds have oil in
Kirkuk the same way as Saudis have oil in Saudi
Arabia. Who is to tell us; that Kurds cant benefit
from their own national wealth theirs from time
immemorial for over 12,000 years, but Saudi Arabs
can benefit from theirs? The British and France,
like they did in the 1920s ? Werent they the ones,
who started all these wars? They were indeed. It
should be U.K. and France therefore, to push for an
Independent Kurdish state more than any other
government, as a beginning to repair the destruction
they have left behind since the 1920s.
They should have the human dignity and honor to
admit to their past leaders mistakes in being
anti-Kurd rather than letting their egos and greed
silence the crucial historical facts, critical to
support an independent S. Kurdistan without further
delays.
I call upon them to do so not because of what I
wrote in this article to remind them about the vital
facts, creating the present devastated Kurdish
nation, but because it is the only right thing left
for them to do if they mean well.
So far the two main British agents: Paul Harvey and
Leanne Sanders during the 2003-2004 have caused over
two years of delay in Reversing the ethnic cleansing
against the Kurds since 1968 known as Arabization in
Kurdish city of Kirkuk, a malicious act committed
under the nose of our own Ambassador Paul Bremer,
the Administrator of the Coalition of Provisional
Authority or CPA. It is beyond any defender of human
rights and peace loving world citizens mind, to try
and guess why Mr. Bremer kept them at their
responsible capacities, knowing the fact that they
were anti-Kurd, appeasing the 10,000 dinar Arabs
sent by Saddam.
The longer we have waited, the more difficult it has
become to execute TALs article 58.
After all, didnt Mr. Bremer know; that it was the
British government itself, which first used chemical
weapons against the people of Iraq by 1920 as the
following published news commentary article by
Jonathan Glancey indicates?
Guardian, April 19, 2003:
Our last occupation
Gas, chemicals, bombs: Britain has used them all
before in Iraq
Jonathan Glancey, Saturday April 19, 2003
Churchill was particularly keen on chemical
weapons, suggesting they be used "against
recalcitrant Arabs as an experiment". He dismissed
objections as "unreasonable". "I am strongly in
favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised
tribes _ [to] spread a lively terror _" In today's
terms, "the Arab" needed to be shocked and awed. A
good gassing might well do the job.
Read More at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,939608,00.html
Steve Tataii, U.S. Representative since the 2002
elections.
E-mail:
tataii2003congress@msn.com
Top |
® 
