®
Back - Home - About - E-mail

 Welcome to Kurd Net ® Add URL | Link to us
Web Hosting
Today in the History Chat Online News RSSFree stuffArchiveDownload
Arabic NewspapersCall KurdistanHistory of EventsMoney lineWallpapersGraphicsMusic Box
PersonalArt & MusicMiscellaneousOrganizationsDocumentaryPoliticsPress & Media


 

Want to place your banner here ? send email for details



Search Kurd Net, Keyword or URL

 Tales and tools, By Dr Kamal Mirawdeli

 Source : KRM
  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 


Tales and tools, By Dr Kamal Mirawdeli 19.12.2005

 




That day I went just to have fish and chips in a shop in Tooting. Inside the shop there was a very large framed photograph of Kamal Ataturk in military uniform. An English client asked about the picture. The kebabmen, obviously Turks, started to talk with a very broken English but inflated Turkish pride and excitement about this great leader of their people. Kamal Ataturk built a new nation for the Turks from the ashes of 1.5 million mass-eliminated Armenians and the occupation of their land and the massacre and subjugation of Kurds and the occupation of north Kurdistan. And here in London the Turkish kababchi is using even his kebab shops to maintain and promote his nationalism through the awesome posture of his historical leader embodied in his portrait.

But it is not only the Turk in the kebab shop in London, or the Turks everywhere who talk about Kamal Ataturk with respect and reverence. Many people in the world do, especially Westerners. I do not want to discuss the right and wrong of this attitude. My point is this: Kamal Ataturk is revered because he was victorious. He was determined to keep and rebuild a nation he called Turk, and a country he called Turkey, by sheer strength of will and brutal determination to crush and victimise others, including a whole ethnic community, in the process. Yet Kamal Ataturk remains a symbol of pride and embodiment of power for Turkish people and a historical figure to be respected by the whole world. Western historians usually consider his Turkey as a model of modern Westernised secular and democratic bridge with Islam!!

What would have happened if Kamal Ataturk had compromised, appeased, given in or been defeated: He would have become a pre-Hitler Hitler. This is the awful irony of history.

My point is that history is the story of victors and achievers. You are not a leader if you cannot achieve anything for your own nation. Can you imagine Ataturk defending the rights of all ethnic groups, peoples and minorities in Lusanne and giving away all what the Turks already had in order to appease others or to make himself popular to the British and the Europeans or to find opportunities to be recognised as a leader and president of a country called Armanistan or Kurdistan or whatever entity the others decided for him?!!!

My point is not that it is wrong or undesirable to defend the rights of others, to compromise, to achieve whatever you can achieve through fair and just methods and mechanisms. My point is that leaders do not represent themselves and their whims and externalised egos. They represent a cause of a nation, its identity, history, culture and future. The strength, respect and historical position of a leader come from his distinctive identity, commitment to the cause of his or her people and refusing to compromise or to sell himself and his nation for posts and accumulation of illegitimate wealth.

But leaders who are immersed in corruption and criminality and lack credibility, integrity and intellectual ability cannot become historical leaders. They are given a position of power not because of who they are but because of what they are, in other words because they are lackeys. And lackeys are not even instrumental. They are just tools.

The dictionary definition of a tool is “an object designed to do a particular kind of work.” Objects are not subjects. They are functions, filling a space of need to achieve a result wanted by the tool user. But the tools by definition are only of temporary usefulness: either the tool user no longer needs the tool after performing “the particular kind of work” and then throws it away or puts it aside. Or the tool itself through over-use loses its edge and usability and thus has to retreat and retire.

Tools cannot speak to history but they echo the words, needs and desires of masters, any masters. They are not even historical tales, just forgotten tools.

www.kurdistanreferendum.org    

Related links: Armenian Genocide by Turkish Muslims against Christians

Top

  Kurd Net does not take credit for and is not responsible for the content of news information on this page

 
 

Copyright © 1998-2008 Kurd Net® . All rights reserved. ekurd.net
All documents and images on this website are copyrighted and may not be used without the express
permission of the copyright holder.